Review of the Arab press (UPI) VIA-WASHINGTON TIMES) Amman, Jordan 01/31/05)
Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050131-072244-6121r.htm
UPI} UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL
UPI} UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Amman, Jordan, Jan. 31 (UPI) -- Arab press roundup for Jan. 31:
Arab newspapers Monday highlighted news and commentaries on the Iraqi
general elections that took place Sunday, with some criticizing them
and others praising them. The London-based al-Quds al-Arabi said the
high turnout of voters showed the Iraqi people wanted democracy like
all other Arabs living under tyrannical regimes, but insisted that
did not mean the polls were "real" or that the results will get Iraq
out of its escalating crisis and move towards substantial democracy.
The independent Palestinian-owned daily asked: "What is this
democracy that President George W. Bush praises when the voters don´t
even know the names of the candidates or know their political
programs?" It opined that the "American elections in Iraq" had sent
the "worst kind of message to the Arab masses because it is a
democracy that was imposed by the occupation, came on the corpses of
100,000 Iraqis and based on ethnic and sectarian considerations." The
paper, with pan-Arab nationalist trends, said democracy was public
participation in determining the formation of government and
political system, "but the democracy of the mini-American Iraqi
government" had isolated the Sunni sect and areas in Iraq. It added
the interim government had sentenced the Sunnis to political death
and that what happened in Iraq was a "poisoned democracy." It said
the elections in Iraq were like U.S. elections taking place without
the participation of New York, Florida and California, adding these
would not be considered legitimate elections.
-0-
Lebanon´s independent Daily Star said in its editorial that Iraqis
ignored the threats of terrorism to cast their ballots as dozens lost
their lives for the opportunity to vote. The independent daily said
it hoped that the elections, the effort, the financial cost and human
sacrifice was worth it, but added the "ultimate test of the value of
the sacrifice will be whether the months ahead will see recognition
on the part of the country´s Shiites and Kurds that Sunnis were
mostly not part of Sunday´s election process." It said that whatever
the reasons for a Sunni absence, "the fact remains they are still
Iraqis and that the outcome of the vote is not 100 percent legitimate
without them." It argued that was why the results of the elections
were not conclusive, "despite their historic status, being the first
important step in what will hopefully be a new Iraq that has shaken
off the yoke of tyranny." The paper said it was thus necessary for
the majority Shiites and the occupying power of the United States,
to "safeguard the Sunnis and their legitimate interests," adding that
they must guarantee a future role for them in the country if further
violence was to be avoided. "Washington´s blundering has already cost
too much in blood and destruction," the paper said, "lessons should
have been learned." It insisted that it was the Iraqis who had the
greatest stake in their country, not the United States, adding
that "if Sunday´s sacrifices are to be judged by history as
warranted, the democratic process must be taken beyond this first
step."
-0-
The United Arab Emirates´ al-Khaleej said in its editorial that the
most important thing to do after the Iraqi elections was to end the
occupation and for Iraq to retrieve its sovereignty. The pro-
government daily, with Islamic leanings, said the results of the
polls should be invested to "make a substantial and effective
transformation in Iraqi affairs towards solidifying internal unity
and dispelling the winds of sedition." It called for a scheduled
withdrawal of the foreign occupation from Iraq "so that the Iraqis
really feel they have been liberated, as opposed to the situation
until now, where they moved from tyranny to colonialism." The paper
asked whether it would be possible to stop efforts of those seeking
Kurdish secession in the north, warning that separating
Kurdistan "would infect the south to change it to southistan, and the
center to become centeristan, creating endless struggles."
-0-
The London-based ash-Sharq al-Awsat said the Iraqi people have thrown
the ball into their politicians court after sending a message to all
the parties and groups that the people were "loyal despite the threat
of death and explosions" by standing in lines to cast their ballots.
The Saudi-owned daily said the Iraqi leaders emerging from the
elections will be responsible before the people, saying the "biggest
crime they can commit against themselves and the electorate is to
push the Iraqi people again to frustration or kill the spirit of hope
the Iraqis created by succeeding in the polls." It insisted the Iraqi
people would accept nothing less than establishing the rule of law in
which all institutions are respected and violence comes to an end.
The paper added that Iraqi politicians were before a huge test after
the masses showed they wanted to build a strong and prosperous
country, adding that the politicians should be up to this challenge
by taking responsibility with "a lot of awareness and persistence."
-0-
Jordan´s independent al-Ghad daily ran a political cartoon on the
Iraqi elections, indicating that only a small, but happy, minority
had participated in the polls. Iraq is depicted through the back of a
hand, with only the index finger standing alone and covered in ink
with a smiling face on the fingernail. Unhappy and angry faces are
seen on the three other fingers and thumb. (Copyright 2005 United
Press International 01/31/05)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY