Iraqi opposition strives to unite for post-Saddam rule (TELEGRAPH UK) Christina Lamb 12/15/02)
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/12/15/nirq315.xml&sSheet=/news/2002/12/15/ixnewstop.html
DAILY TELEGRAPH
DAILY TELEGRAPH Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
The biggest meeting of the Iraqi opposition for a decade began in a
London hotel yesterday in an urgent effort to present a unified front
capable of replacing Saddam Hussein.
About 315 delegates from 50 groups gathered at the Metropol Hilton,
west London, surrounded by Christmas decorations and a bemused
Japanese party on a "cultural highlights" tour.
With Baghdad now in their sights, the delegates to the two-day
conference have an official agenda aimed at drawing up a declaration
of democratic principles and selecting a co-ordinating committee
of "free Iraqis" to act as a rallying point for their compatriots.
The real goal, however, is to transform their public image from a
fractured group of bickering parties to a united and credible
opposition front which could fill a power vacuum - rather than a
United States military governor - should a US-led strike succeed in
toppling Saddam.
"We live in a region where everyone wants power," said Fawzi Hariri,
the head of foreign relations for the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP),
one of the two main Kurdish factions that share power in the
autonomous north of Iraq. "We´ve come to understand that we can only
have that and sustain a democratic system if we co-operate."
Sharif Ali bin Hussein, a monarchist who hopes to reclaim the throne
once held by his father, insisted: "We´re no more divided than many
political parties in the West. What unites us is our determination to
overthrow Saddam."
Such claims are undermined by the level of bickering over who would
attend the conference, which led to it being delayed several times.
Some groups have boycotted it, and not all of the participants are
convinced that life in a post-Saddam Iraq will be better - in
particular the Kurds, who fear the loss of their autonomy.
The conference took place only after the Iranians acted as a broker,
bringing together three of the most powerful opposition leaders in
Teheran last week.
The meeting involved Ahmad Chalabi, the leader of the Iraqi National
Congress (INC), a Pentagon-supported umbrella group; Mohammad Bakir
Hakim, who leads the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in
Iraq, a mainly Shia group with Iranian backing and a large following
in southern Iraq; and Massoud Barzani, the head of the KDP.
While they might have been galvanised into a show of unity by the
prospect of imminent power, everyone is jostling for position behind
the scenes.
"Now that they can sniff Baghdad, everyone is trying to stake their
claim," said Samir David, from the Bet Nahrain Democratic Party,
which represents the Assyrian Christians.
"We would prefer an American or British administration as they would
at least guarantee our rights."
Although most of the delegates are exiles who have spent decades
holding long and seemingly pointless discussions, they deny
suggestions that the conference is unrepresentative.
Mr Hariri said: "Change can take place in Iraq only with the support
of the people of Iraq. America might be able to remove Saddam but
cannot establish stability without the help of the Iraqi opposition.
Iraq is not Afghanistan. It´s a very sophisticated country with
sophisticated people and they need their say."
The meeting began with a reading from the Koran, after which leaders
of the six main opposition groups made speeches declaring themselves
in favour of a federal democratic Iraq.
The conference was attended by 100 observers and more than 500
journalists. The person most observers wanted to see was Mr Chalabi,
a former banker who clearly sees himself as president-in-waiting.
"The real action is not what is happening in the conference but in
the small rooms in meetings between Chalabi and Barzani", said an INC
official.
There was, however, no escaping the sense that the real decisions
were being taken in Washington.
American pressure has ensured that the conference will not attempt to
form a government in exile - something the US opposes for fear that
it might deter Iraqis, particularly in the armed forces, from rising
up against Saddam.
Many in the Pentagon are so disillusioned with the exiled opposition
that they believe that any successor to Saddam will come from within
the current regime.
"I had high hopes and low expectations but now even my hopes are
low," said Faisal Istrabadhi, one of the delegates and a member of a
leading aristocratic family in Iraq who now runs a law practice in
Chicago.
He said many Iraqis felt betrayed by President Bush´s father, who
called on them to rise up against Saddam at the end of the 1991 Gulf
War, but then allowed the regime to crush the revolts by Shi´ites and
Kurds.
"In 1991, the people of Baghdad were waiting to greet the American
army as liberators but they didn´t come," he said.
"Since then, they´ve had 11 long years of sanctions and suppression.
The Americans have no margin of error this time."
Additional reporting by Adam Lusher (© Copyright of Telegraph Group
Limited 2002. 12/15/02)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY