Cairo Coup Another Obama “Success” (COMMENTARY MAGAZINE) Jonathan S. Tobin 08/13/12)
Source: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/08/13/cairo-coup-another-obama-success/
Commentary Magazine
Commentary Magazine Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Last week’s terror attack on Egyptian army troops by jihadists whose
ultimate aim was to kill Israelis provoked an unexpectedly harsh
reaction from Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi. The chaos in the
Sinai is the direct result of the revolution that brought down the
Mubarak regime. The Hamas government looked to benefit from the
triumph of their Muslim Brotherhood allies, but the embarrassing
slaughter of Egyptians by anti-Israel terrorists has led the new
government in Cairo to shut down the smuggling tunnels between Egypt
and Gaza. The prospect of increased security cooperation between
Egypt and the United States is slightly encouraging, though Israel’s
exclusion from talks concerning its border is both spiteful and
foolish.
But while the crackdown in the Sinai and along the border with Gaza
may be a hopeful sign the new Egyptian government is unwilling to be
dragged into conflict with Israel by the Palestinians, the real news
in the aftermath of the shooting is very bad indeed. Morsi’s sacking
of Egypt’s intelligence chief (who ignored warnings from Israel about
a possible terror attack) is one thing, but the decision of the
Egyptian leader to fire two of the country’s leading generals is more
than just a personnel shuffle. If Morsi has assumed power of the
country’s military, the notion that the army would or could act as a
brake on the Muslim Brotherhood has been shown to be a myth. His
firing of Egypt’s defense minister and the army chief of staff makes
it clear the Brotherhood is now completely in control of the country.
This calls into question not just the future of regional stability
but the Obama administration’s equivocal attitude toward the
Brotherhood’s push to power.
In the aftermath of the Egyptian election in which Morsi triumphed
over the military’s preferred candidate, optimists believed the
army’s acquiescence to the Brotherhood’s victory was bought by the
group’s willingness to share power. The assumption was that the
military would remain in charge even if Morsi would have the
trappings of power. But the firing of the two defense chiefs has
shown foreign observers underestimated both Morsi and the
Brotherhood’s will to come out on top. It’s also apparent that such
thinking overestimated the ability of the army to retain the
influence it had when Mubarak, himself a former general, ran things.
The implications of what Time aptly termed a Muslim
Brotherhood “coup” are far-reaching.
Morsi may not be interested in a direct confrontation with Israel or
in allowing Hamas’ desire to keep the border in flames. For all of
the fraternal bonds between the Brotherhood and Hamas, even Egyptian
Islamists may believe, as most of their countrymen do, the
Palestinians are ready to fight Israel to the last Egyptian.
But if there are no longer any effective checks on the Brotherhood,
the idea that the United States or Israel can rely upon the army to
keep Egypt from being transformed into an Islamist country is without
any rational basis. This ought to do more than scare the country’s
secular community or even the Christian Copts who constitute up to
ten percent of Egypt’s population. It will mean the start of a
process whereby the Brotherhood obtains control over every segment of
Egyptian society and government. Optimists hope this will mean
nothing worse than a copy of Turkey’s drift from secular freedom to
Islamist authoritarianism under President Obama’s friend Recep Tayyip
Erdoğan. But no one should be surprised if a more radical group like
the Brotherhood is not satisfied with that and eventually pushes for
more radical changes in both Egyptian society and its relations with
Israel.
The Obama administration thought it was managing the situation in
Egypt via support of the military while conducting outreach to the
Brotherhood. But what they find themselves with now is a situation in
which the U.S. is giving $1.5 billion per year to a country
controlled by an extremist group whose ideology places it in a state
of continual conflict with the West. President Obama and his
cheerleaders in the media may think he has deftly handled an Arab
Spring which has seen the region’s most populous country transformed
from a Western ally to an Islamist loose cannon. If this is foreign
policy success, I’d hate to see what failure looks like.
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY