Left-Wing Journalist Regrets Golan Stance (INN) ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS) By Maayana Miskin 08/09/12)
Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/158754#.UCSM76Egeuk
INN} ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS
INN} ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Left-wing commentator and reporter Ari Shavit admitted Thursday that
he was wrong about giving the Golan region to Syria. Shavit revealed
his change of heart in an opinion column in Haaretz.
“No one likes to admit they were wrong. I don’t, either,” Shavit
began. “But sometimes you have no choice.”
If Israel had given the Golan to Syria, he said, “then today we’d
already have bloodshed. If we had gone to bed with Assad a decade
ago, today we’d be waking up with jihad.”
Shavit traced his change of heart back to a trip to the Golan. “I
couldn’t help but think what would be happening today if the
ideological position I supported – peace for the Golan - had gained
acceptance,” he said. “I had to admit, that if the worldview I
believed in had been implemented, brigades of the World Jihad would
be stationed next to Ein Gav, and Al-Qaeda camps would be on the
shore of the Kinneret.”
Shavit explained that he once believed that peace with Syria would
prevent war, isolate Iran and limit its power, and lead to the
disarmament of hostile forces threatening northern Israel. He
believed peace with Syria “would be stable, like the peace with
Egypt,” he added.
He recalled his efforts to promote the Golan withdrawal, including TV
appearances. He thought his opponents’ position was “unreasonable and
immoral,” he said, and he thought history would prove them wrong.
Instead, he said, the opposite occurred. Looking at the situation
now, he said, he believes that his opponents were right. If the Golan
had been traded for a declaration of peace in 2000, he said, today
there would be frequent shooting attacks, terrorism targeting Israeli
towns, and attempts to poison Israeli water sources. The Golan would
be more dangerous than the Sinai, he added.
Shavit reassured his readers that he has not joined the political
right, and still believes Israel has a moral obligation to try to
make peace with its enemies. He still seeks to “end the occupation,”
he said – but carefully, with weight given to the warnings from the
political right. (IsraelNationalNews © 2011 08/09/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY