Morsi convenes Egypt’s parliament in defiance of court and military (WASHINGTON POST) By Ernesto Londoño and Steve Hendrix CAIRO, EGYPT 07/10/12)
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/morsi-convenes-egypts-parliament-in-defiance-of-court-and-military/2012/07/10/gJQAGHr9ZW_story.html
WASHINGTON POST
WASHINGTON POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
CAIRO — A power struggle between Egypt’s Islamist president and the
country’s generals and judges intensified Tuesday, as a three-day
battle for authority threatened to eclipse progress toward a
democratic transition.
The day’s events included a brief parliamentary session called by
President Mohamed Morsi’s political party, in defiance of a military
warning. After the largely symbolic meeting, the country’s highest
court ruled that Morsi did not have the right to reconstitute the
body, which was dissolved by the generals after an earlier court
decision.
The dispute threatened to complicate a planned visit to Cairo on
Saturday by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Speaking in
Vietnam on Tuesday, Clinton urged “intensive dialogue” between Morsi
and the military to avoid derailing progress in Egypt’s transition to
democracy.
Morsi’s move to convene parliament also appeared to widen political
fault lines. It triggered sharp rebukes from judges and liberal
politicians, including some members of parliament, who accused him of
overreaching.
The decision to call the dissolved parliament back into session
marked a bold gamble by Morsi, who was propelled into office by the
Muslim Brotherhood’s prodigious political machine. The Brotherhood’s
Freedom and Justice Party held nearly half of the seats in parliament.
But Tuesday’s developments also highlighted the pitfalls the
president is likely to face as he asserts himself as a statesman with
limited powers and strained relations with the secular chiefs of the
armed forces and members of a judiciary who were appointed by his
predecessor, Hosni Mubarak, the autocrat who led Egypt for three
decades.
Sharp warnings from the military and the courts had raised the
prospect that a reconvening of parliament could prompt a violent
confrontation between lawmakers and security forces deployed outside
the building. But members of parliament arrived more than an hour
before the scheduled time and faced no resistance as they walked into
the building.
The only item on the agenda was a ruling by the Supreme
Constitutional Court last month that found that one-third of
legislators had been elected unlawfully. The decision prompted the
then-ruling military generals to disband parliament and call for new
elections.
Parliament Speaker Mohamed Saad Katatny, of the Freedom and Justice
Party, said he would refer the court ruling to an appeals panel for
review. He did not schedule additional sessions, nor did he suggest
that parliament would seek to legislate while the dispute remains
unsettled.
Momen Zarour, a lawmaker from the Freedom and Justice Party, said the
brief meeting served notice that Egypt’s new political leaders will
not be intimidated.
“We had to hold a session today, and we will hold more sessions next
week,” said Zarour after rising from midday prayers with several
dozen protesters on the sidewalk outside the gates of the
building. “This is the first democratically elected parliament that
Egypt has had in its history.”
Zarour said that during the session, lawmakers affirmed their respect
for the constitutional court and even the ruling that invalidated one-
third of parliament’s members. But they rejected the subsequent
decision by Egypt’s military council, which had ruled the country
since Mubarak’s ouster last year, to dissolve the entire legislative
body.
“We salute the court. We honor its ruling,” Zarour said. “But the
army cannot remove every member of parliament. We are appealing that
now.”
Independent lawmaker Mostafa Bakri was among the lawmakers who
boycotted the session. He issued a statement later resigning from his
post and calling the Muslim Brotherhood’s move “political thuggery.”
The head of a prominent association of Egyptian judges also lashed
out at Morsi. At a fiery news conference Monday, he gave the
president 36 hours to pull back his decree to reinstate the Islamist-
led parliament or face the prospect of a judicial strike.
But in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the center of last year’s revolution,
Brotherhood supporters held a jubilant rally after sundown to
celebrate the reconvening of parliament.
“Down, down with military rule,” said Mona Dawoud, a Brotherhood
supporter draped in black from head to toe. “This decree is the first
step to breaking military rule.”
Although Morsi’s decree and the parliamentary session appeared to
delight his followers, it also threatened to tarnish the image of a
unifying president that the conservative Islamist had sought to
project since assuming office. Experts and politicians said the sides
are likely to cool off until further court rulings on the dispute are
issued.
“A lot of this depends on where people perceive power to be,” said
Michael Wahid Hanna, an Egypt expert at the Century Foundation in New
York. “You could see this cutting a number of ways.”
During a short news conference in Vietnam, Clinton called for “a
concerted effort on the part of all to deal with the problems that
are understandable but have to be resolved.”
Clinton expects to meet with Morsi as part of an attempt to reset
relations between Washington and Cairo after the turbulent 17-month
military rule during which the longtime alliance became badly frayed.
The United States hopes to help jump-start Egypt’s economy by
beginning to release unspent aid earmarked for the country and
helping it secure loans it will need to offset the hemorrhaging of
its foreign reserves.
Hussein Gohar, a founding member of the liberal Egyptian Social
Democratic Party, said many Egyptians were taken off guard by how
quickly Morsi chose to pick a fight. Gohar said that by holding only
a brief session, the Brotherhood saved face with its supporters and
averted a nastier confrontation with the courts and the generals. But
one thing is clear, he added: This is the beginning of a protracted
fight.
“Everyone is asking who has the real power in their hands, the Muslim
Brotherhood or SCAF,” he said, referring to the Supreme Council of
the Armed Forces. “For now, it’s going to be guesswork. Your guess is
as good as mine.” Stephanie McCrummen in Hanoi contributed to this
report. (© 2010 The Washington Post Company 07/10/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY