Israeli government report faults Netanyahu’s handling of 2010 flotilla raid (WASHINGTON POST) By Karin Brulliard JERUSALEM, ISRAEL 06/13/12)
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/israeli-government-report-faults-netanyahus-handling-of-2010-flotilla-raid/2012/06/13/gJQAt4QKaV_story.html
WASHINGTON POST
WASHINGTON POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
JERUSALEM — An Israeli government watchdog sternly criticized Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday for poor decision-making in
the lead-up to a deadly Israeli military raid on an aid flotilla
bound for the Gaza Strip in 2010.
Netanyahu, the state comptroller wrote in a long-awaited report,
failed to heed multiple warnings, including from the army chief, that
an Israeli military effort to enforce its blockade by intercepting
the vessels could erupt into violence. The report also said he did
not sufficiently coordinate or document high-level government
discussions on how to handle the eventuality.
Although the report appeared unlikely to dent the domestic strength
of Netanyahu, whose governing coalition is one of the largest in
Israel’s history, it renewed questions about his willingness to weigh
alternatives as Israel considers a military strike on Iran’s nuclear
facilities.
In recent months, some retired Israeli senior security officials have
argued that an attack on Iran would be unnecessary and dangerous, and
they have faulted Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak for
dismissing such warnings as they aggressively push the case for such
an operation.
Echoing that criticism, the report on the flotilla operation said
Netanyahu relied on several one-on-one, undocumented discussions with
Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman before the incident.
Netanyahu gathered senior government ministers — known as
the “security cabinet” — only once, five days before the raid, the
report said.
Israeli commandos killed nine pro-Palestinian activists during
clashes aboard the Mavi Marmara, one of six ships in the flotilla
that had sailed from Turkey and attempted to breach Israel’s naval
blockade of Gaza. Gaza is under the control of the Islamist
organization Hamas, which Israel and the United States consider to be
a terrorist organization, and Israel says the blockade was necessary
to prevent shipments of weapons from reaching militants. The
activists said they were transporting humanitarian aid.
The raid provoked international condemnation of Israel and the
blockade, and it dramatically frayed ties between once-close allies
Israel and Turkey. Under extreme international pressure, Israel eased
its land embargo after the incident.
Netanyahu said in a short statement Wednesday that on his watch,
government deliberations on security-related matters “have been
unprecedented in their scope and depth.”
He added that proof of his sound decision-making could be seen today
in Israel, where residents enjoy what he called “a level of security
the likes of which have not been seen for many years.”
Critics seized on the report as evidence that Netanyahu and Barak
could not be trusted to handle Iran, whose nuclear program Israel
considers an existential threat.
“Today, we all have to be very concerned. The Barak-Netanyahu pair is
making decisions on security affairs in a way that is not serious and
not responsible,” Dov Henin, a lawmaker with the left-wing opposition
party Hadash, told Israel Radio. “In the same way they made decisions
regarding the Marmara, they can make decisions tomorrow regarding
Iran. Therefore, this pair is dangerous.”
Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss did not criticize the outcome of the
flotilla raid, and he stressed that it might have turned out the same
even if Netanyahu had planned better for it.
That point was underscored by National Security Council Director
Yaakov Amidror, who also suggested that the government recognized
there was a problem and has rectified it. Successive flotillas and
fly-ins by pro-Palestinian activists have occurred without violence,
he said in a statement.
In an apparent reference to Iran, Amidror said: “Today, there are
other major issues that we are dealing with in the international
arena. I think that if one looks at all these events, one understands
that the decision-making process is much, much better.” Special
correspondent Samuel Sockol contributed to this report. (© 2010 The
Washington Post Company 06/13/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY