Stop these dangerous whispers / Obama says he despises leaks, but they still go on (NEW YORK DAILY NEWS OP-ED) BY PETE KING 06/11/12)
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Articles-Index-Top
In his press conference on Friday, President Obama said that recent
leaks “touch on critical issues of war and peace, and they’re
classified for a reason: because they’re sensitive, and because the
people involved may in some cases be in danger if they’re carrying
out some of these missions.”
The President is right about that.
He also said that the “notion that my White House would purposely
release classified national security information is offensive. It’s
The record tells a different story.
The New York Times recently devoted 9,000 words to profiles of
President Obama. The articles divulged what are described as
America’s most successful intelligence programs. They include details
of CIA drone strikes against Al Qaeda, and an apparent U.S.-Israeli
cyberoperation against Iran’s nuclear program.
The articles cite Situation Room conversations, quote officials such
as Vice President Biden and place reelection campaign chief David
Axelrod in counterterrorism meetings.
These leaks come on the heels of disclosures about an alleged
penetration of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
Last month, I urged FBI Director Robert Mueller to conduct a full
inquiry into the leaks about this operation, and to include
investigating the White House staff. The FBI responded by saying
that “leaks threaten ongoing operations and damage our relationships
with our foreign partners...leaks can put the lives of sources at
risk, which also makes it difficult to recruit sources.”
Last year, leaks about the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden began on
the day after its completion. These disclosures may well have
endangered special operations and may have resulted in the arrests of
alleged CIA sources, including a Pakistani doctor and others.
These leaks further extended to 16 meetings between moviemakers and
Pentagon, CIA and National Security Council officials. These
meetings, urged by the White House and arranged by Democratic-leaning
lobbyists, remain under investigation by the Pentagon’s inspector
And these were not the first serious compromises of sensitive
information during the Obama administration.
Earlier leaks included information about the suspect in the attempted
Times Square bombing, which the suspect heard, leading him to flee,
endangering police who raced to capture him.
Information was leaked about Al Qaeda’s December 2009 attack on the
CIA’s base in Khost, Afghanistan, causing pain to fallen officers’
survivors and embarrassment to an ally.
And someone in the administration has revealed information about
Israeli capabilities and intentions regarding Iran, shared with us in
This administration has been careless with intelligence secrets from
Almost its first action was to release details of the CIA’s enhanced
interrogation program, which former CIA Director and current
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta admits helped lead to finding Bin
Laden. The decision to release this information denied future
Presidents the option of using these tools to save American lives.
I support the most aggressive strategies to secure our homeland and
to counter Iran. The President deserves full credit for killing Bin
Laden and for other inevitably public successes.
Let me be clear: What I object to is the exposure of intelligence
programs to journalists favored by the White House, and even
Hollywood movie producers, in what I can only interpret as attempts
to aid the President’s reelection.
On Friday, the President concluded his remarks about leaks by saying
that, “We’re dealing with issues that can touch on the safety and
security of the American people, our families or our military
personnel or our allies, and so we don’t play with that.”
But members of your administration appear to have done just that, Mr.
That is why I called for the appointment of a special counsel to
investigate these life-threatening leaks.
Attorney General Eric Holder cannot seriously be trusted to pursue
crimes that may implicate senior officials in the administration. On
Friday, he announced that two U.S. attorneys were selected to lead an
investigation into the leaks. It is vital that this investigation be
thorough and independent of Justice Department control.
While the administration has rightfully initiated an unprecedented
number of leak prosecutions, these are all centered around
nonpolitical, career employees who have, for the most part, leaked
information having no direct bearing on the President.
The intelligence, law enforcement and military personnel who defend
us, and the human sources who take great risks on our behalf, on the
assurance that we will do our best to protect their security and
identities, deserve no less.
King, a U.S. congressman, represents parts of Nassau and Suffolk
counties. He is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and
a member of the Intelligence Committee. (© Copyright 2012
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY