Mideast game-changer / Israel’s costly Lebanon ‘victory’ (NEW YORK POST OP-ED) AMIR TAHERI 06/06/12)
Source: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/mideast_game_changer_n9yZjy0eYZr4yuNlYUpl5H
NEW YORK POST
NEW YORK POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
With a Shiite-Sunni sectarian war brewing along the Syrian border,
few Lebanese might want to remember the Israeli invasion of 1982,
which started 30 years ago today. Yet that war and its sequels not
only changed the balance of power in Lebanon but also set the stage
for the regional power struggle across the Middle East
today.
Israel’s key war aim was to flush the Palestine
Liberation
Organization out of southern Lebanon, thus dismantling Yasser
Arafat’s fiefdom known as Fatahland.
The Shiites of Southern
Lebanon, the majority in the area, would
become the chief beneficiaries of the Israeli victory. This is why
they greeted units of the Israeli Defense Force with flowers and
sweets.
Few imagined that within less than two years, Fatahland
would be
replaced by an even more hostile “Imamistan” — a fiefdom controlled
by Hezbollah, acting as Iran’s cat’s paw.
To deal with that
unintended consequence of its victory, Israel had
to hang on to a strip of territory inside southern Lebanon for two
decades, at enormous cost in blood and treasure.
Israel’s second
objective was to capture or kill Arafat and coterie.
It didn’t — because the United States, acting with UN approval,
intervened militarily to escort Arafat and hundreds of his associates
out of Beirut and into safety. And the massacre of Palestinians at
Sabra and Shatila, although carried out by the Phalangist militia,
provided Arafat and his clan with a new addition to their anti-
Israeli narrative of victimhood.
America and its chief ally in
that intervention, France, paid heavily
for breathing fresh life into the moribund Palestinian cause: Some
241 US Marines and 57 French paratroopers were murdered in suicide
attacks organized by Iranian and Syrian agents in Lebanon. In the
following decade, 23 American and French citizens were a held hostage
by Hezbollah on orders from Tehran and Damascus, and three were
murdered.
Israel’s third objective was to impose Bashir Gemayel,
a Maronite
militia commander, as president of Lebanon, hoping to have a friendly
neighbor to the north. Once again, a seemingly easy victory quickly
turned into a setback: Gemayel became president — but only for a
brief moment before he was murdered by Syrian agents.
Already
mired in civil war, Lebanon quickly degenerated into a
badland where terrorism, kidnapping, drug-smuggling and gun-running
became industries employing tens of thousands of people. The civil
war would last another decade in its intense form — and, in a sense,
continues to this day.
The 1982 war marked the start of a
process in which Israel has been
sucked into asymmetric war against militias controlled by regional
powers. At different times, Libya under Col. Khadafy, Iraq under
Saddam Hussein and the Arab oil kingdoms financed and armed different
armed factions in Lebanon. Iran and its main Arab client Syria still
do so today.
Thirty years later, Lebanon poses a serious threat
to Israel’s
security. Yesterday, the official Iranian news agency, IRNA, boasted
that the Islamic Republic had supplied Hezbollah with thousands of
short- and medium-range missiles capable of “hitting every single
spot” in Israel. It also claimed that 30,000 Hamas fighters and
5,000 “holy warriors” from the Islamic Jihad, based in Gaza, were
getting ready “for the final battle with Zionism.”
Militarily,
Israel achieved a clear victory in Lebanon in 1982. But
its leaders couldn’t translate that victory into lasting political
gain. Part of that was due to UN intervention, which was (as always)
designed to prevent Israel from cashing its chips, as it were. But
another part was Israeli leaders’ failure to see beyond the tactical
changes that their victory had produced.
The war was a game-
changer in the sense that it turned Lebanon into a
battleground between Iran and Syria (backed by Russians) on one side
and the United States, with its Arab allies plus Israel, on the
other.
Today, Lebanon remains a major strategic prize — control
of which
could impact the conflict in Syria and the prospect of change in
Iran. (Copyright 2012 NYP Holdings, Inc. 06/06/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY