Michael Ross: The road to success in Syria lies through compromise with Russia (NATIONAL POST COMMENT) 06/06/12)
Source: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/06/05/michael-ross-the-road-to-success-in-syria-lies-through-compromise-with-russia/
NATIONAL POST
NATIONAL POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
The key to ensuring that the situation in Syria doesn’t devolve into
a scenario where Iran emerges as the regional winner in a post-Assad
end-game, lies not with the UN, U.S. or EU, but with Russia. Russian
President Vladimir Putin will meet Iranian President, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad on the sidelines of a summit in Beijing next week. The
meeting is ostensibly tied to diplomatic efforts aimed at curtailing
Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but to even consider that Syria won’t be at
the top of the agenda is to ignore Iran’s latest regional chess move.
The Cold War isn’t quite over yet and I highly recommend to anyone
interested in reading exactly how much of it still exists and what is
actually going on should examine Edward Lucas’ insightful and well-
crafted book, Deception: Spies, Lies and How Russia Dupes the West.
Despite being bereft of a communist ideology, Russia still has its
own agenda and it is in the recognition of this fact that the west
has to understand Russia’s geopolitical posture in the Near East.
First and foremost, the west needs to recognize that despite Russia’s
involvement in Syria’s current strife, Russia and Iran’s interests in
the region are far from remotely corresponding. Russia should be very
wary of Iran’s potential to become an emboldened nuclear-armed
Islamic Republic sitting on its southern borders. Russia should also
be very concerned with Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security
(MOIS) as it makes furtive forays into Russia’s Muslim majority
border regions and while Moscow no doubt enjoys some of the
difficulties Iran poses to its western rivals, Iran has designs of
its own that very much contest Russia’s interests as much as they do
the U.S. and EU.
The key to solving Syria (and Iran) lies in understanding what Russia
wants and how compromises can be reached that meet Russia’s needs as
well as safeguarding western interests in the region. Russia wants a
foothold in the Mediterranean and this has been consistently provided
till now by the regime in Damascus. While there may be strategic
reasons to deny Russia access to the ports of Lattakia and Tartous,
the alternative – while giving advantage to western navies – will not
be worth much if Iran fills the Syrian vacuum after the regime
eventually crumbles and falls. An Iranian-sponsored replacement
regime with control over long-range missiles with non-conventional
warheads will constitute a threat that cannot be ignored by Israel.
This scenario is nothing less than a formula for yet another Middle
East war.
Iran is already planning contingencies for a post-Assad Syria and is
making every effort to ensure that its IRGC/MOIS assets in Syria
secure Iran’s presence regardless of the outcome. The current
intensive diplomatic efforts (that include Russia) to reduce the
Iranian nuclear threat, should not be hijacked by any Iranian
initiative to wed Tehran to Moscow in the discussion about Syria’s
future. Iran is extremely weakened by the events in Syria and
desperately needs Syria to manage its regional proxies in Hezbollah
and HAMAS. Without the Syrian connection, both terrorist entities
could find themselves withering on the vine without direct logistical
and operational contact from their masters in Tehran.
Russia also needs the West. It has Africa-levels of of HIV infection
and in some regions a lower life-expectancy than Bangladesh. Western
economies need to work with Russia and China or suffer irreversible
set-backs. The major super-powers that were once engaged in ensuring
the mutual destruction of the opposing side now have a historic
opportunity to oust the Assad regime and simultaneously weaken Iran’s
menacing aspirations for Near East domination. These are goals that
are to the advantage of both sides, but will only be achieved through
intense negotiation and painful compromise. The Russians have proven
that when push comes to shove, they can be reasoned with so long as
they are not humiliated and shut out of world affairs as they were in
Libya.
In 1989 with the demise of the Berlin Wall and communism along with
it, Ayatollah Khomeini told the Russians: “I strongly urge that in
breaking down the walls of Marxist fantasies you do not fall into the
prison of the West and the Great Satan. I openly announce that the
Islamic Republic of Iran, as the greatest and most powerful base of
the Islamic world, can easily help fill up the ideological vacuum of
your system.”
Perhaps as a starting point of negotiation, the Russians should be
reminded exactly how Iran truly regards them. Russia might then pause
and realize that its real friends are actually here in the West. (©
2012 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. 06/06/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY