Jews Liberal, But Obama Losing Ground (COMMENTARY MAGAZINE) Jonathan S. Tobin 06/04/12)
Source: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/06/04/jews-still-liberal-but-obama-losing-ground-poll/
Commentary Magazine
Commentary Magazine Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
A poll conducted by the liberal Workmen’s Circle and published last
week should reassure liberals that their views still predominate in
the Jewish community, but it provided little comfort to those hoping
President Obama can come anywhere near his 2008 share of the Jewish
vote. The poll showed American Jews are far more liberal than most
Americans. They are willing to pay higher taxes, don’t seem to like
financial institutions, love unions and favor abortion and gay
marriage in numbers that far outstrip the rest of the country. The
respondents also give President Obama a big majority at a time when
national polls are calling the presidential election a dead heat.
But despite the effort of the poll’s left-wing sponsor to treat this
as a victory for the incumbent, it actually confirms the fact that
the president is bleeding Jewish support this year and appears to be
falling far short of the share of the community’s vote that he won in
2008. With the poll showing him getting only 59 percent of the Jewish
vote as opposed to the 78 percent he received four years ago, there
is no disguising a drastic decline in support for the Democrat.
The Workmen’s Circle attempts to soften the blow by saying if
undecided voters broke down the same way decided voters did, it would
give Obama a 68 to 32 percent lead among Jews. But that’s an absurd
assertion. History shows us there is no reason to believe that is the
way undecided voters actually vote. If anything, it is more likely
that in a close race, undecideds are more likely to break toward the
challenger, but that is merely a guess. But even if that wildly
optimistic supposition were to be borne out, it would still represent
a ten percent drop in the Jewish vote for Obama–a result that would
have to be treated as a blow to the Democrats and a minor success for
Republicans.
If, however, the final results turn out to be closer to the 59
percent figure, Obama would receive the lowest percentage of the
Jewish vote in a presidential election of any Democrat since Jimmy
Carter.
The pollsters insist, not without some reasons, that Israel does not
appear to be a determining factor in the presidential vote. It bears
repeating that the vast majority of Jews are not single issue voters
on Israel and, like most Americans, will cast their votes based on
other issues–principally, the economy.
The pollster’s analysis points out:
Significantly, neither attachment to Israel nor confidence in
Israelis vs. Palestinians as peace seeking strongly factor into Jews’
presidential vote decision. This was among the findings of the survey
regarding American Jewish attitudes toward Israel.
Obama voters and Romney voters do differ on Israel; Romney voters are
more attached to Israel and more confident in Israel’s commitment to
peace. However, these differences are totally explained by prior
factors like religiosity and political ideology, than are the primary
determinants of Obama vs. Romney preferences.
These are fair points but if, as the poll shows, the decline in
Obama’s share of the Jewish vote is greater than the losses he is
encountering in other sectors in national polls, analysts need to
ponder what it is about the president that is repelling a higher
proportion of Jewish supporters to abandon his ship than elsewhere.
That is a question the Workmen’s Circle prefers not to ask, let alone
answer.
Because, as the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports, this otherwise
heavily liberal population is still steadfast in its support for
Israel as well as sympathetic to its current government, it is not
unreasonable to suppose that those sentiments have led them to be, at
the very least, a bit less favorable to a president who spent his
first three years in office picking fights with Israel. Like the rest
of the country, more Jews are disillusioned with the president’s
handling of the economy, but is that enough to explain a potential
loss of almost a quarter of the votes he received four years ago?
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY