|
Iran has been the chief beneficiary of the Obama administration’s
decision to throw in the towel on Iraq, and as Team Obama prepares to
repeat its mistake in Afghanistan, Iranian authorities seek to make
it two for two. |
Paragraph-1 Contains
|
|
On June 1, Iran sponsored commemorations in Kabul to mark the 23rd
anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini’s death. From the accompanying BBC
Persian photo essay and article, my American Enterprise Institute
colleague Ahmad Majidyar—hands down the shrewdest analyst of
Afghanistan and Pakistan in Washington—highlighted two points. First,
Mohammad Akbari, a Shi’a jihadi leader now in Afghanistan’s
parliament, declared, “Religious beliefs have no borders. Those who
say today that Khomeini belongs to Iran will next day relate Prophet
of Muslims Muhammad to Saudi Arabia.” However, Majidyar notes, some
Afghans protested the pro-Iranian festivities. “This is Kabul, not
Tehran or Qom,” some declared. Other held signs which read, “Puppets:
no more betrayal.” Meanwhile, Iranian officials have ramped up
pressure on Afghan politicians to reject the Strategic Cooperation
Agreement, reportedly offering $25 million in bribes. |
Paragraph-2 Contains
|
|
Afghans, like Iraqis, do not naturally favor the Islamic Republic.
Persian culture is one thing; Tehran’s politics and its official
ideology quite another. However, as Iranian proxies not too subtlety
point out, “you may like the Americans better, but we will always be
your neighbor.” But, Afghans have also never lost a war; rather, they
defect to the winning side. With the sense that, under Obama, the
United States has no staying power, the Iranian government is making
its push to fill the vacuum—or as much as they can fill before
Pakistan pushes back. Until Obama signals that victory matters more
than the American political timeline, the Iranians will have the
strategic advantage. |
Paragraph-3 Contains
|