Home  > Israel-News Today
Settle the land, legally (ISRAEL HAYOM OP-ED) Minister Michael Eitan 06/03/12) Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=1993
The Headline Contains

* Choose from 1 of the 4 descriptions for the headline and or any paragraph.

In 1979, an Israeli settlement was established on land in Rujeb, southeast of Nablus in Judea and Samaria. When the High Court of Justice ruled that the settlement had been built illegally (as it was constructed on privately owned Palestinian land that was requisitioned for a civilian settlement and not for military purposes), then Prime Minister Menachem Begin did not hesitate to order that it be relocated. His actions upheld the rule of law and strengthened the settlement enterprise. They paved the way for the establishment of the Elon Moreh settlement and, as Begin had promised, led to the creation of "many more Elon Morehs."
Paragraph-1 Contains
In his decision on Saturday to relocate disputed homes in the Ulpana neighborhood of Beit El while vowing to build 10 new homes for each one that is removed, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu followed in Beginīs footsteps. He followed the path that maintains that it is possible to pursue a settlement enterprise that is subject to the rule of law and to High Court rulings. His decision sanctifies the approach of the Likud as a national liberal party that attracts wide swaths of the centrist and right-wing public in Israel and legitimizes the settlement enterprise.
Paragraph-2 Contains
The prime minister did not succumb to the temptation of magic legal solutions, such as the "outpost arrangement bill," whose damage would far outweigh the benefit its authors had hoped to gain. Promoting such an initiative would have created a situation in which the Knesset legislates laws over land whose residents donīt have the right to vote. This, in turn, would have sparked a wave of international criticism. Even Israelīs closest allies would not have been able to defend such legislation, which would tarnish the countryīs reputation with accusations of apartheid and threaten it with international sanctions. In the end, the High Court would have ruled that this law does not apply in Judea and Samaria, and the government would have had to implement the court order.
Paragraph-3 Contains
Netanyahu is offering settlers the best proposal possible under the circumstances: The five structures built illegally will be removed, but dozens of legally constructed buildings will rise instead. That way, the settlement enterprise will continue to grow while the supremacy of the law is maintained. I hope that the settlers accept the prime ministerīs decision and cooperate with the government, which has no peer and never will when it comes to protecting their interests.
Paragraph-4 Contains

Israel Hayom Articles-Index-Top Publishers-Index-Top Return to Top