The Ulpana saga (JERUSALEM POST EDITORIAL) 06/04/12)
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
As we approach June 5, the 45th anniversary of the beginning of the
Six Day War, we are reminded that the legacy of our miraculous
victory carries both blessings and challenges.
Yet again the stability of a government coalition is threatened by
disputes over Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria. In recent
weeks, the High Court ruled that the “Ulpana outpost,” a neighborhood
in Beit El, must be demolished by July 1. The property rights of a
Palestinian man took precedence, the court said.
In response, lawmakers from Likud, Yisrael Beytenu, Shas, National
Union and Habayit Hayehudi have drafted legislation that would bypass
the High Court ruling and empower the state to expropriate the
Palestinian man’s land, allowing the Ulpana outpost to remain in
place. The Palestinian would receive monetary compensation.
Like the dozens of MKs who have come to their defense, we cannot help
but feel sympathy for the Ulpana residents. It was during Ehud
Barak’s stint as prime minister in 2000 that the government built the
Ulpana outpost – complete with access roads and other infrastructure –
using generous economic incentives to encourage citizens to move
Under different circumstances, a compromise could have been reached.
The most equitable solution would have been to handsomely compensate
the Palestinian landowner, providing him with an alternative plot of
land on which he could actually build.
But agreeing to reach such a compromise would immediately label the
Palestinian a traitor in the eyes of his fellow Palestinians.
Instead, he must insist on taking possession of land so close to Beit
El that he will be unable to use it.
And there are, according to MK Ya’acov Katz (National Union), about
9,000 Israeli residents of Judea and Samaria who are living in a
similar situation and are, therefore, facing the prospect of being
evacuated like the Ulpana residents.
But retroactively “koshering” outposts like the Ulpana neighborhood
is not the answer. True, in principle the government has the right to
expropriate land in the State of Israel. But it also has an
obligation to protect individual property rights.
As Barak Medina, dean of the Faculty of Law at the Hebrew University,
pointed out, even inside the Green Line the state would have a hard
time justifying to the Supreme Court its right to expropriate the
property rights of one citizen for the benefit of another citizen.
When this expropriation is done in a discriminatory manner – against
Palestinians who lack full rights under Israeli law for the benefit
of Jews who enjoy these rights – it becomes even more indefensible.
Further complicating the situation is the fact that Israel has never
annexed Judea and Samaria (even if it had this annexation would never
be recognized internationally).
Therefore, even from the state’s perspective, the legal status of
Judea and Samaria is “disputed” even if it is not
considered “occupied.” That’s why consecutive governments have
refrained from applying Israeli law there.
Forty-five years ago Israel not only survived certain annihilation
but actually managed to win a miraculous victory. Judea and Samaria
came under Israeli control.
The historic resonance and religious symbolism of places such as
Shiloh, Hebron and Jericho sparked a Jewish reawakening.
Confronted by Arab nations’ refusal to reconcile themselves to
Israel’s existence, peace through negotiation and territorial
compromise was not an option. Under the circumstances, it was only
natural that Jews would desire to return to the heart of the Jewish
Some of the most talented, best educated, most patriotic Israeli
citizens established settlements in Judea and Samaria in the fast
And it is only natural that our lawmakers have a desire to protect
the Jewish settlements. But passing the outpost law will only spark
yet another conflict between the Supreme Court and the Knesset and
pit liberal-minded Israelis against their more nationalist brethren.
Israel will be subjected to international condemnation and a renewed
effort will be launched to delegitimize the entire settlement project.
“If you grab too much,” says a Talmudic adage, “you risk losing it
all.” (© 1995-2011, The Jerusalem Post 06/04/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY