Detailed, "engaged" Iran nuclear talks go to second day (REUTERS) By Andrew Quinn and Justyna Pawlak BAGHDAD, IRAQ 05/23/12 9:03pm EDT)
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/24/us-iran-nuclear-idUSBRE84L0VV20120524
Reuters News Service
Reuters News Service Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
(Reuters) - Talks between Iran and world powers to defuse a dispute
about Iran´s nuclear goals go into a second day on Thursday with
Washington cautiously hopeful of progress towards an agreed framework
for addressing concerns that Tehran wants to build an atom bomb.
"I believe we have the beginning of a negotiation," a senior U.S.
official said of the discussions, which opened on Wednesday in the
Iraqi capital, Baghdad, in a renewed effort at diplomacy that will
seek to ease decades of ingrained mistrust.
"We have got engaged ... we have had detailed discussions" for a
potential further round of talks, the official said, adding the
meeting would continue into a second day on Thursday.
The discussions, watched closely by global oil markets as well as by
Iran´s arch-enemy Israel, are aimed at exploring ways to settle a
long-standing dispute about a nuclear energy programme the West
suspects is aimed at nuclear bomb research. Tehran has long stated
the programme is strictly for peaceful purposes.
Both sides - Iran on the one hand and the United States, Russia,
China, France, Britain and Germany on the other - have been publicly
upbeat about the scope for an outline deal following a 15-month
diplomatic freeze and exploratory talks in Istanbul last month.
In previous meetings, the two sides could not even agree on an
agenda, with each largely repeating known positions and Tehran
refusing any dialogue on changes to its nuclear path.
But international energy markets remain nervous, unsettled by
extended Western sanctions imposed on Iran´s crude exports and the
specter of a Middle East conflict arising from possible Israeli
strikes against Iran´s nuclear installations.
Speaking after the first day of discussions, the senior U.S. official
said the meeting revealed a "fair amount of disagreement" but also
areas of common ground.
"But still we have to come to closure ... about what are the next
appropriate steps."
The overall goal of the six countries jointly negotiating with Tehran
is an Iranian agreement to curb uranium enrichment in a transparent,
verifiable way to ensure it is for peaceful purposes only. Iran´s
priority is to secure an end to sanctions isolating the country and
damaging its economy.
The senior U.S. official later confirmed that the six powers had also
put specific measures to lessen sanctions pressure on the table in
the discussions as part of a possible confidence-building package,
but declined to elaborate.
IRAN HINTS AT FLEXIBILITY
The pivotal proposal by the six, led by European Union foreign policy
chief Catherine Ashton, was for Iran to halt its enrichment of
uranium to the higher fissile concentration of 20 percent, her
spokesman, Michael Mann, said as talks got under way.
That is the Iranian nuclear advance most worrying to the West since
it largely overcomes technical obstacles to reaching 90 percent, or
bomb-grade, enrichment. Iran says it is enhancing the fissile purity
to such a degree only for medical research.
Tehran has repeatedly ruled out suspending enrichment as called for
by several U.N. Security Council resolutions.
But Iran has hinted at flexibility on higher-grade enrichment,
although analysts caution that it would be unlikely to compromise
much while sanctions remain in place.
Iranian media close to the Tehran government said its chief
negotiator, Saeed Jalili, presented its own five-point package of
proposals covering a "comprehensive" range of nuclear and non-nuclear
issues.
But a European diplomat, referring to the reported Jalili proposals,
said: "We are not quite sure what these five points are. We are
trying to find out. There are no details."
(Additional reporting by Patrick Markey and William Maclean in
Baghdad, Marcus George in Dubai, Fredrik Dahl in Vienna and Steve
Gutterman in Moscow; Writing by Mark Heinrich; Editing by Peter
Cooney) (© Thomson Reuters 2012. 05/23/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY