The Man Who Would Rule Egypt (FrontPageMagazine.com) by Mark Tapson 05/23/12)
Source: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/05/23/the-man-who-would-rule-egypt/
Front Page Magazine.com
Front Page Magazine.com Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Egypt, the original heart of the Arab Spring, goes to the polls this
Wednesday and Thursday to elect a new president, and the Obama
administration’s favored choice, Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, may
emerge the victor. “He could be the president who puts Egypt on a
path towards genuine democracy,” says one U.S. official. But the self-
styled “liberal” Islamist is no moderate.
One of the two front-running candidates (along with Amr Moussa, 75, a
former foreign minister under Mubarak and most recently secretary-
general of the Arab League), Fotouh, 61, is a doctor and former
member of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose political party took nearly
50 percent of the seats in parliamentary elections and is the best-
organized political force in the country. He served for 25 years in
the Brotherhood’s leadership body before being expelled last year
when he defied the group’s leaders to run for the presidency.
Fotouh is described as a reformist member of the organization, and as
such has received support from younger Brothers, even though the
Brotherhood is putting forth its own candidate, Mohammed Morsi.
Fotouh is viewed as more liberal than the other Islamists in the
race, prompting comparisons to Turkey’s Recep Erdogan. That would be
the same Erdogan who proclaimed that “there is no moderate Islam,”
who advised Turkish immigrants in Europe that “assimilation is a
crime against humanity,” who has taken an increasingly bellicose
stance toward Israel – and who is a favorite of Obama in the Middle
East.
“Aboul Fotouh has said that he wants to be the Erdogan of Egypt, and
I think that U.S. relations with Turkey may be a good example of what
we could expect,” says Stephen McInerney, executive director of the
Project on Middle East Democracy. In that case, what we can expect is
an increasingly militant fundamentalist regime hostile to Israel.
In addition to some Muslim Brothers, Fotouh has also received support
from ultra-fundamentalist Salafis, who are competing with the
Brotherhood. Since the Arab Spring revolution, the Salafis won nearly
a quarter of the parliamentary seats, surprising the unprepared
Brothers with their strong showing.
Now, in response to the success of Fotouh’s campaign and his Salafi
backing, the Brotherhood has ramped up its religious rhetoric to draw
Salafis to Morsi’s support. At a recent rally near Cairo University,
speaker after speaker cast Morsi as the only true Islamist candidate
and the one who would ensure the implementation of sharia. The clear
message is that Fotouh is not Islamic enough.
They need not be concerned about that. An avowed radical in his
youth, Fatouh helped found the terrorist organization Al-Gama’a Al-
Islamiyya, which now endorses his candidacy, and spent five years in
Mubarak’s prisons alongside such figures as al Qaeda’s Dr. al-
Zawahiri. Newsweek points out that some Egyptians are casting a
suspicious eye on his split from the Brotherhood, and are accusing
Fotouh of downplaying his Islamist tendencies.
The Washington Institute’s Eric Trager, who interviewed him last
year, said that “the notion that Aboul Fotouh is some kind of
progressive is farcical.” Said Sadek, a political sociologist at the
American University in Cairo, says electing Fotouh would be the
equivalent of establishing a theocratic state. “He didn’t renounce
the ideas of the Moslem Brotherhood even when he was jailed by
Mubarak,” says Sadek . “You’re telling me he’s different now?”
GLORIA Center Middle East expert Barry Rubin notes that the Obama
administration is unconcerned about Aboul Fotouh’s aggressively
Islamist comments – for example, that Israel is racist, an enemy of
Egypt, and an illegitimate occupier – as mere “campaign rhetoric.”
The assumption is that the reality of governance will make a moderate
out of Fotouh, as it does for American politicians. Rubin points out
that similar wishful thinking about extremists has never played out
that way historically in the real world.
In an interview last year, Aboul Fotouh apparently betrayed himself
as a 9/11 “truther”; he was quoted as claiming about the 9/11 attacks
that “It was too big an operation… They [the United States] didn’t
bring this crime before the U.S. justice system until now. Why?
Because it’s part of a conspiracy.” Needless to say, it doesn’t bode
well for Egypt-U.S. relations to be dealing with an Arab conspiracy
theorist.
In an al-Jazeera interview, Fotouh called for the Brotherhood to work
toward full legalization and transparency, but he claims that he
is “against the Muslim Brotherhood’s participation in party politics.
The Brotherhood should not become a political party nor should it
have a political party.” At the same time, he also believes
that “none of the Brotherhood’s goals or their practices are
illegitimate. In fact, their aims and their methods are very much
legitimate.”
Questioned in the interview about what kind of state Egypt would be
under his leadership, Fotouh played up his liberal side:
First, Islam does not recognize a theocratic state… A civilian state
according to Islamic thought must have a constitution written by the
people which defines the roles and responsibilities of all
authoritative bodies. You can call this a modern state, a civilian
state, a democratic state…
Asked how such an Islamic state would relate to its Christian or
atheist citizens, he replied that an Islamic state embraces all its
citizens, and said an Egyptian Christian would enjoy the same rights
and responsibilities as a Muslim: “There is no difference. Islam does
not discriminate based on gender, religion, color, and the new
constitution must not either.” On a radio show, one of the hosts
identified herself as Christian and asked about the second-class
status of her people in Egypt; he responded vaguely, “Nations rise
only if there is justice. Otherwise there will be no development.”
About Egypt’s relation with Israel, he replied that his country would
maintain its treaty with Israel, “but it will be revised. The
articles in it which are in Egypt’s interests will be kept, and those
that are detrimental to Egypt’s interests will be taken out.” So much
for compromise.
As Egypt’s election date arrives, Western observers are optimistic
that Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh’s moderate nature will prevail – just
as they once were optimistic about the moderate nature of the Arab
Spring. (Copyright © 2012 FrontPageMagazine.com 05/23/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY