Coalition of the Willing (IHT) INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE OP-ED) By SHMUEL ROSNER JERUSALEM, ISRAEL 05/10/12)
Source: http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/israel-could-reap-great-benefits-from-unity-government-formed-by-netanyahus-likud-party-and-mofazs-kadima-party/?ref=global
IHT-International Herald Tribune
IHT-International Herald Tribune Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
JERUSALEM — Monday morning I was on the phone with Doron Avital, a
smart if quirky Knesset back-bencher from the Kadima Party. The
announcement that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party was
forming a grand coalition with Kadima was still a day
away.
Avital is one of a small group of former commanders of the
General
Staff Reconnaissance Unit, Sayeret Matkal, Israel’s legendary
commando unit. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was an officer in
it; Defense Minister Ehud Barak is a former commander; and the head
of Avital’s Kadima Party, Shaul Mofaz, is a former deputy
commander.
But as the latter three were plotting to stun Israel
with the boldest
political move of the decade — canceling the Sept. 4 election and
forming a unity government — Avital was still in the dark and getting
ready for a primary battle.
“Are you sure you want to do this?’’
I asked him half jokingly. Polls
say that if elections were held today, Kadima would only hold on to
11 to 13 seats. That seemed like a lost cause; a loss was likely for
Avital.
“The problem with you,’’ he quipped, “is that you read
yesterday’s
news instead of reading tomorrow’s.” In retrospect, his remark seems
prophetic, but he was as surprised by “tomorrow’s news” as I. It was
an astonishing announcement.
Mofaz, the head of Kadima,
negotiated secretly with Netanyahu and
dragged the largest opposition party — in fact, Israel’s largest
party — into the coalition. The all-but-formalized decision to go to
the polls was canceled at 2 a.m. The ruling government will remain in
place for another year and a half. The ruling parliamentary coalition
will be the largest in Israel’s history: 94 Knesset members out of
120 are now members of the coalition.
It’s the kind of majority
that can do anything; the kind of majority
that makes one’s democratic impulses itch. The opposition was not
outlawed, but it is totally paralyzed. The coalition can do whatever
it wants. It can curb the power of the courts, as some members would
very much like it to do. It can provide the prime minister with the
backing to strike Iran. It can do nothing. Or it can be a unique
opportunity to do some good, to make unusual things happen.
Many
Israelis — about 44 percent according to a Channel 10 News poll —
woke up Tuesday morning to the news and, after an initial scratching
of the head, decided that it was not such a bad idea after all to
have a unity government.
The ideological differences between the
Likud and the Kadima parties
are not great, and having a coalition that is very stable — namely, a
coalition in which no party can force the hand of the majority by
threatening to quit — might prove beneficial to the public’s greater
good.
Israelis have long complained that the electoral system
gives too
much power to smaller parties of society. They have long protested
the ability of shrewd tacticians representing small constituencies
(mostly the ultra-Orthodox) to get whatever they want because of
their disproportionate amount of power in a system that relies on
small parties. They have long yearned for a coalition strong enough
to make some necessary painful changes — like getting rid of the
arrangement that gives the ultra-Orthodox a pass from military
service.
Netanyahu and Mofaz, appearing Tuesday at a joint press
conference,
promised to do exactly that: they said they would pass a “historic,
just and equal solution’’ to the problem of ultra-Orthodox unequal
service, they said they would change “the structure of government” to
make Israel’s system more stable and less chaotic.
That is an
agenda befitting a coalition of such scope. But the proof
will be in the pudding: for such coalition to be justified,
Avital’s “tomorrow’s news’’ has to also be about reforms and changes.
Netanyahu’s scary majority can be justified only if the agenda it
promotes is also scary — in scope and ambition. (Copyright 2012 The
New York Times Company 05/10/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY