Netanyahu’s Overwhelming Mandate (COMMENTARY MAGAZINE) Jonathan S. Tobin 05/03/12)
Source: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/05/03/netanyahu-overwhelming-mandate-polls-obama-iran-elections/
Commentary Magazine
Commentary Magazine Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
With the approval of the outgoing Knesset, Israel is moving toward
early elections that will send its people to the polls on September
4. The decision will allow a new government to be in place in advance
of the U.S. presidential contest that will take place two months
later. If Israeli opinion polls are correct that will mean even if
President Obama is re-elected, he still will be faced with his old
antagonist Benjamin Netanyahu as his counterpart in the U.S.-Israel
alliance.
Since Obama spent much of his first term seeking to undermine if not
oust Netanyahu from office, the timing of the elections may be no
coincidence. Past American presidents such as the elder George Bush
and Bill Clinton sought to intervene in Israeli elections to procure
a more pliant Israeli negotiating partner. But with Obama fighting
hard to hold onto Jewish votes by assuming the pose of Israel’s best
friend, he dare not take a swipe at Netanyahu before the September
vote. Given the lopsided result that pollsters expect, it might not
make a difference even if he did try it.
Some kibbitzers have asserted that Israeli polls that show
Netanyahu’s coalition gaining seats should not be misinterpreted as a
personal mandate for the prime minister, as his Likud Party is likely
to get only 30 or 31 of the Knesset’s 120 seats. That’s a foolish
argument. If that is how the voting goes, such a result would still
place Likud as the largest party by far and in position to command an
easy majority with its normal coalition partners. Due to its
proportional voting system, no party has ever won a majority on its
own. But a new poll sponsored by the left-wing Haaretz newspaper
shows Netanyahu is also the overwhelming choice of Israelis to be
their prime minister.
In the poll, Israeli voters were asked which of the several party
leaders they wanted to see become prime minister. Despite the
multiple choices available, nearly a majority — 48 percent — chose
Netanyahu. His closest competitor was Labor Party head Shelly
Yacimovich at 15 percent. The only others to register anything beyond
minimal support were Yisrael Beitenu’s Avigdor Lieberman (who serves
as Netanyahu’s foreign minister) at 9 percent and Kadima’s new leader
Shaul Mofaz, who got only 6 percent despite his claim to be the only
viable alternative to the incumbent.
The survey also asked Israelis what they thought of the criticisms of
former Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin that Netanyahu and Defense Minister
Barak were “messianics” who aren’t fit to lead the country. That
result will also give no comfort to Netanyahu’s foreign and domestic
critics who have hyped the story about Diskin as it noted Israelis
disagree with the assertion by a 51-25 percent margin.
While four months can be a lifetime in politics, given the utter lack
of support for Netanyahu’s putative rivals, his re-election is close
to a lock. This has to frustrate Obama, who has made his distaste for
Netanyahu no secret. It also sets up a possible timetable for the
confrontation with Iran that may not conform to the president’s plans.
As some of Netanyahu’s Israeli critics have noted, the timing of the
Israeli election probably takes an attack on Iran off the table until
after September. But that was the case anyway. An Israeli strike
while the P5+1 talks with Iran were ongoing was always unthinkable.
But that does leave a window of two months between the two elections
that might allow an Israeli offensive against Iranian nuclear targets
in advance of the U.S. elections, a juxtaposition that would make it
difficult, if not impossible, for Obama to oppose or punish Israel
for such a decision.
Count me among the skeptics that Israel would choose to act
unilaterally under those seemingly favorable circumstances. But Iran
notwithstanding, by securing his re-election in advance of 2013,
Netanyahu is ensuring that a U.S. president will not be able to use
his clout to try and get him defeated the way Clinton did in both
1996 and 1999. Netanyahu’s overwhelming democratic mandate will
largely insulate him against U.S. pressure even if Obama is also re-
elected.
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY