Netanyahu, Lieberman, Prepare for Election Day Battle Over Haredi Draft (JEWISH PRESS) By: Yori Yanover 05/01/12)
Source: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/the-knesset/netanyahu-lieberman-prepare-for-election-day-battle-over-haredi-draft/2012/05/01/
JEWISH PRESS
JEWISH PRESS Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
After the Israeli Supreme Court has struck down the Tal Law, which
sought to encourage over time the inclusion of Haredim in military
service, the court, for all intents and purposes, has required the
state to draft some 60,000 Haredi youths this August, in addition to
7,000 yeshiva students who already serve in keeping with the
expiring, old law.
Prime Minister Netanyahu this week told representatives of reservist
activists, who are protesting as part of the “suckers’ encampment,”
that the Tal Law will be replaced with “a more egalitarian and just
law,” and that “the division of the burden must be changed. What has
been is not what will be.”
The 2002 Tal Law, named after retired Supreme Court justice Tzvi Tal,
must be extended every five years. Among other things, the law
allowed full-time yeshiva students to delay their army service until
age 23, at which time they could choose to study full time, enlist
for a shorter military service, or volunteer for a year of national
service.
“I know that there are many hitchhikers who voted to automatically
extend the Tal Law. I am not one of them,” Netanyahu told the
protesting reservists. “The Tal Law will be replaced by a more
egalitarian and just law, and I will submit it.”
Netanyahu said the new law would include civilian national service
for Arab citizens, who are not required to serve in the military.
Meanwhile, à la guerre comme à la guerre, opposition leader Shaul
Mofaz, along with the head of the Labor and Meretz parties, have
threatened to bring proposals for early elections before the Knesset
in the coming days.
Likud coalition partner Yisrael Beiteinu has also threatened to bring
a request for early elections over amending the Tal Law, with party
leader Avigdor Lieberman saying that “Our obligation to the coalition
is over.”
In preparation for the August deadline, and perhaps as a show of
political muscle on the eve of an approaching early election, on May
9 Yisrael Beytenu will introduce the bill “IDF, National, or Civilian
Service Law Proposal” in the Knesset, to regulate, once and for all,
the enlistment of all Israelis into military, national or civilian
service.
Submitted by MKs David Rotem, Moshe Matalon, Robert Ilatov,
Anastassia Michaeli, Hamad Amar, Lia Shemtov, Faina Kirshenbaum, Alex
Miller and Orly Levy Abekasis, the new law sets out to promote “equal
sharing of the burden of service among the State’s citizens.”
The new law introduces a system in which every citizen will serve in
the IDF, or in national or civilian service.
While “National Service” is already established as an alternative,
voluntary option for Israeli youths who do not wish to serve in the
IDF for a variety of reasons, the new law establishes
compulsory “Civilian Service,” or community service, in “institutions
for the absorption of new immigrants, health care, institutions for
the elderly population, nursing homes, welfare departments in local
authorities, fire services, the Israel Police Force, Environmental
Protection and volunteer organizations.”
The new law will keep in place some of the existing deferrals of
military service, such as the “Hesder Yeshivas,” which integrate
periods of active IDF service and periods of study. Likewise, the
Defense Minister may “exempt or grant a deferral from IDF service to
outstanding students at universities, outstanding athletes and
outstanding artists, provided that the number of exemptions and
deferrals under this section not exceed one thousand per year.”
It is not clear what’s the basis for the quota of one thousand
exemptions. The Jewish Press’ attempted to seek an explanation from
the IB faction as to why this particular number but so far have not
received a response.
But the number coincides with the other limit, of a maximum of one
thousand exemptions and deferrals per year to long-term yeshiva
students, “in order to continue the cultivation of prodigies among
yeshiva students.”
And shortly afterwards, the new law gets to the center piece of the
thing, overturning of the Deferral Law for long-term yeshiva
students. In one, laconic phrase, the proposal decrees:
“The Deferral of Service Act for Long-term Yeshiva students of 2002
(5762) is hereby overturned.”
The proposal concludes with an ideological substantiation of the
above, curt statement:
“The idea that Torah study somehow forbids seeking employment or
justifies deferring IDF service is incompatible with the Jewish
faith. Maimonides explicitly states: “Anyone who decides that he will
occupy himself with Torah and will not do any work profanes the Name
of God, degrades the Torah, extinguishes the light of religion, hurts
himself, and removes his life from the world to come – for it is
forbidden to derive any benefit from matters of Torah in this world”
(The Laws of Torah Study 3)
“Therefore, it is proposed that every citizen be obligated to serve
the State of Israel. Anyone serving a complete term of civilian
service, will be exempted from IDF service. Conditions and terms
during and after the term of service will be comparable to the terms
of those who served in the national service, whose terms are
regulated by legislation.”
But the law does not set out to explain how the military is to
provide for the special needs of tens of thousands of Haredi men
(and, ostensibly, women, if its purpose is to institute full
equality), nor is it envisioning the educational process required to
bring those recruits up to speed so that their contribution have some
tangible value, other than to serve as a political lesson on equality
before the law.
Indeed, the new, proposed law fails to envision a situation of mass
draft dodging on the part of Haredi recruits, and the resources that
would be required to bring them all in.
In that, the new law mimics the impatience and short-temper of the
Beinish court’s decision to finally kill the Tal Law. The old law
worked slowly, perhaps too slowly, but it attempted to stir up
evolution, instead of a radical confrontation.
Some material from JTA was used in this article. (© 2012
JewishPress. 05/01/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY