UK food retailer’s Israel boycott could harm Palestinians (JERUSALEM POST) By JONNY PAUL IN LONDON, JEREMY SHARON 04/30/12)
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Britain’s fifth-largest food retailer, the Co-operative Group, will
stop doing business with four Israeli companies, accounting for
£350,000 worth of annual trade, over the companies’ ties to the West
The four companies the Co-op is severing ties with are Agrexco, Arava
Export Growers, Adafresh and Mehadrin.
Following the announcement, pro-Israel blogger Elder of Ziyon noted
that Agrexco, as well as exporting Israeli and settlement produce,
also exports Palestinian produce from Gaza marketed under the
company’s Coral brand.
The boycott seems likely to affect Palestinian farmers who use
Agrexco to export their produce to Europe.
In response to a Jerusalem Post query, the Co-operative Group refused
to comment on the harmful affect its boycott of Agrexco might have on
Palestinian farmers in the Gaza Strip, saying only that “the Group
will also continue to actively work to increase trade links with
Palestinian businesses in the Occupied Territories.”
According to information from the IDF, more than 800 tons of
strawberries were exported from the Gaza Strip through Israel in 2010
and 2011, and more than 13.8 million flowers were exported during the
So far in 2012, more than 50 truckloads of flowers, tomatoes, dates,
bell peppers and strawberries have been exported by Palestinian
farmers through the border crossings with Israel.
Going forward, the Co-op said over the weekend, “we will additionally
no longer engage with any supplier of produce known to be sourcing
from the Israeli settlements.”
The food retailer clarified that the “position is not a boycott of
Israeli businesses, and we continue to have supply agreements with
some 20 Israeli suppliers that do not source from the settlements.”
A representative of the Palestinian Union of Agricultural Work
Committees called on other European supermarkets to take similar
Jon Benjamin, the chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British
Jews, called the Co-op’s boycott “naive and a retrograde step.”
“This extension is significantly less than the full boycott of Israel
sought by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
However, the Co-Op has not fully understood the Jewish community’s
serious concerns with an everincreasing slippery-slope boycott
Despite the Co-op’s claim that it is applying its policy even-
handedly, it still sells products from “Occupied Northern Cyrus”
labeled as produce of Turkey, Benjamin said.
“The Co-Op claims that it may buy more produce from other Israeli
companies in place of these four. This remains to be seen, and we
will monitor the outcome closer,” he said.
A spokesman from the British Israel Coalition Public Affairs
Committee (BICPAC), a recently established London-based Israel
advocacy organization, also castigated the Cooperative’s stance.
“It seems the Co-Op has been hijacked by members who joined simply to
vote in this sort of discriminatory policy. It has made clear where
its loyalties lie, and has decided to take the side of those who wish
to delegitimize Israel and attempt to damage her thriving economy,”
The organization called on friends of Israel to respond accordingly
until the Co-op changes its stance.
“We call on friends of Israel from all communities to respond by
making clear where their loyalties lie, and choose to shop elsewhere
until this ugly and policy is canceled. There are many shops in the
UK which stock hundreds of Israeli goods. It is the duty of those who
support a just and peaceful settlement between Israelis and
Palestinians to continue buying those goods in shops which do not
deliberately target Jews and Israelis with boycotts,” the BICPAC
In 2010, responding to a Norwegian petition to boycott Israel, Deputy
Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon described those calling for a boycott
of the Jewish state as effectively “boycotting the peace process by
automatically and unequivocally endorsing the Palestinian position
and pushing them further away from the negotiating table.”
In the United States last month, members of the Park Slope Food Co-Op
in Brooklyn voted down a proposal to ban Israeli foods by a landslide.
Late last year, the Trade Union Congress, Britain’s labor federation,
voted to reaffirm its commitment to the boycott of Israel and
to “review” at its annual conference in London its relationship with
the Histadrut labor federation.
The motion called to encourage affiliates, employers and pension
funds “to disinvest from, and boycott the goods of, companies who
profit from illegal settlements, the occupation and the construction
of the Wall.”
Last July, the Knesset approved the “Boycott Law,” which authorizes
Israelis who are the targets of public boycotts – due to being in or
connected with Israel, Israeli institutions or “areas under Israeli
control” – to seek compensation for damages in court. The law also
permits the finance minister to withhold benefits from bodies calling
for boycotts and to prohibit their participation in state tenders.
The law defines a boycott as a call to refrain from cultural,
economic or academic connections with an Israeli citizen, institution
Gil Shefler and Joanna Paraszczuk contributed to this report. (© 1995-
2011, The Jerusalem Post 04/30/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY