Ashkenazi: Iran strike not needed tomorrow (JERUSALEM POST) By YAAKOV KATZ 04/30/12)
Source: http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=267950
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
A strike on Iran is “not needed tomorrow morning,” but Israel does
need to present a credible military threat alongside sanctions and
diplomatic action, former IDF chief of staff Lt.-Gen. (res.) Gabi
Ashkenazi said on Sunday.
Speaking at The Jerusalem Post Conference in New York City, Ashkenazi
said the right strategy was to continue the economic crackdown on
Iran as well as actions that take place “under the radar.”
“I think we still have time. It is not tomorrow morning,” Ashkenazi
said. “It is better to persuade our friends in the world and the
region that it is a global threat and [the government] has done a
good job on this. In any case, Israel needs its own capability since
we cannot [live] under an [Iranian] nuclear umbrella,” he said.
“We need crippling sanctions and much more severe sanctions. It might
now be too late and too light and it needs to be supported by a
credible military threat,” he added.
Former prime minister Ehud Olmert, also speaking at the The Jerusalem
Post Conference, said there was still time to stop Iran with
sanctions and diplomacy.
Olmert said that the United States needed to lead the international
efforts to stop Iran. He slammed the Israeli government for clashing
with US President Barack Obama over the peace process with the
Palestinians.
“There is enough time to try different avenues of pressure to change
the balance of power with Iran without the need for a direct military
confrontation with Iran, and now is not the right time [for a
military strike] which may not lead to the right outcome that is
needed to ensure the security of the State of Israel.”
Speaking out against Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s assertion that
sanctions will fail, Olmert said that there was still time before
military action would be needed. He also criticized Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu’s comparison of Iran to Nazi Germany.
“I am not certain that when we speak loudly it is more helpful than
when we speak privately and quietly with the leadership of those
countries,” Olmert said.
“It is not a good strategy to fight with the [US] president,” he
said. “Israel needs to support and respect the president and not
fight with him.”
Booed by the crowd in New York, Olmert said Israel needed to make
concessions to the Palestinians in peace talks to gain legitimacy in
the international arena. Olmert also said Israel did not need to hold
on to Arab parts of Jerusalem in a peace deal and to retain a Jewish
majority in the capital.
“I am not certain that when we talk about Jerusalem and the
indivisibility of Jerusalem, do we mean in real terms, and how
significant it is for the future of the State of Israel and the
Jewish character of the city of Jerusalem that Arab parts that were
technically added to the city limits will forever remain part of
Jerusalem,” Olmert said.
Turning to the ongoing upheaval in the Middle East, Ashkenazi
revealed that former Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman
visited Israel two months before Hosni Mubarak was toppled and
predicted that either he or Mubarak’s son Jamal would succeed the
president.
Ashkenazi said that someone in the room asked Suleiman how he could
be certain that the transition of power would occur as he said. He
said that Suleiman stated that it did not matter who voted but
rather “who counted the vote.”
The possible downfall of Syrian President Bashar Assad could be a
positive change for Israel, since any regime which succeeds would not
be aligned with Iran or Hezbollah, the former IDF chief said on
Sunday.
“Most of the weaponry that Hezbollah posses comes from Syrian depots,
and the money from Iran,” he said.
However, he shied away from predicting whether and when Assad will
fall. The international community’s failure to take “tangible action”
was like giving Assad a “license to kill,” Ashkenazi said.
Turning to the threats against Israel, Ashkenazi said that Israel was
no longer facing a clear enemy as it did during the Yom Kippur War in
1973.
“In Yom Kippur it was simple. We had to mobilize. You saw the
borders, the fences, minefields, and there was attack and defense,”
he said.
“Today war is different. You still need to mobilize,” but when you go
to the battlefield, “you raise your binoculars and you don’t see the
enemy.” (© 1995-2011, The Jerusalem Post 04/30/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY