UN’s options in Syria are poor to nonexistent (THE GLOBE AND MAIL) PAUL KORING WASHINGTON 04/28/12)
GLOBE AND MAIL
GLOBE AND MAIL Articles-Index-Top
From all-out war to vulnerable pairs of military observers in blue
berets, the United Nations Security Council can authorize a full
spectrum of intervention.
Observers, peacekeepers, peacemakers – the terms vary as do the
mandates. And there is plenty of overlap. Outcomes vary, too.
Some UN missions, such as the traditional buffer-zone peacekeepers
still patrolling a “Green Line” in Cyprus after a half-century, seem
to become part of an imperfect solution.
Others, like last summer’s controversial bombing campaign over Libya,
end relatively quickly but only after morphing, according to some key
players at the Security Council, far beyond their original mandate.
In Syria, the current observer mission is mandated only to monitor a
ceasefire that may never really take effect.
Even if all 300 UN military observers are in place soon, the
mission’s fate is already in doubt.
Most UN missions, like the one in Syria, require the “host” nation –
in this case, Syria – to approve it. And thus Syria can toss the
monitors out if it chooses, just as the UN can pull them if the
mission is rendered ineffective.
Military observers, like those being sent to Syria, are usually mid-
ranking officers who volunteer, on secondment from their “home”
nations to the UN. They will likely operate in pairs or foursomes,
moving in white-painted civilian SUVs. Although considered “unarmed,”
the observers will carry their handguns as part of their uniform –
but they pose no military threat. Their only purpose is to observe.
Given full freedom of movement, observer missions can be very
effective. But without the active co-operation of both sides, and a
clear commitment by the combatants to make a ceasefire work, the
monitors have neither means nor authority to compel compliance.
So far, in chaotic and violent Syria, the handful of observers have,
at times, been obstructed and used as cover for outbreaks of violence.
Already, some want a more forceful intervention. France’s Foreign
Minister, Alain Juppé, has warned that if mediation – as monitored by
the thinnest of blue lines, a mobile UN observer force – fails, then
the Security Council must consider more aggressive military options.
“We cannot allow ourselves to be defied by the current regime,” Mr.
Syria, unlike Libya or Kosovo a decade ago, offers no relatively
simple, militarily achievable outcome by outside powers. There are
real risks that even a UN-mandated military intervention would
escalate into a regional war and spill beyond Syria’s borders.
At the UN Security Council, intervention in a member state takes two
forms; they are referred to as Chapter Six and Chapter Seven, because
that’s where they appear in the UN Charter.
Broadly, Chapter Six intervention, such as monitoring a truce line,
requires the agreement and participation of the parties involved.
Chapter Six operations can’t use force, except in self-defence.
Peacekeeping, monitoring and observer forces in all their variations
are Chapter Six operations.
Far more rare are Chapter Seven missions when the Security Council
approves the use of military force – usually subcontracted to a group
of states – to impose an outcome on an unwilling state.
The Korean War was Chapter Seven. So was the U.S.-led war to oust
Iraq after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. So was last year’s Libyan
campaign, although many – including importantly China and Russia –
contend that the original limited mandate to impose a “no-fly” zone
and protect the civilian population in Libya was unlawfully stretched
so that NATO warplanes, including Canada’s, became the de facto air
force for rebels seeking to oust Colonel Moammar Gadhafi.
The blowback from Libya has so far meant that China and Russia, both
veto-wielding permanent members of the Security Council, have made it
clear they are flatly opposed to any type of “thin-edge-of-the-wedge”
Chapter Seven mandate that could similarly be morphed into major
military intervention in Syria.
Chapter Six operations vary widely. Some, like the current effort in
Syria, are modest in size, firepower and mandate.
Others, like the long-running UN Protection Force in the Balkans in
the 1990s, involved tens of thousands of “blue helmets” from more
than a dozen nations, including Canada, with some units equipped with
light tanks. But because it was a Chapter Six mandate, even those
heavily armed units were severely constrained in the action they
In effect, UNPROFOR peacekeeping troops largely watched the war rage
around them and, in the case of the infamous Srebrenica enclave,
surrendered to Serb forces who then massacred more than 8,000 Muslims
supposedly sheltered in a UN “safe area.”
As the international community grapples with what – if anything – to
do next in Syria, a few stark realities remain.
Short of a full-blown enforceable military mandate – in effect a UN
Security Council licence to wage war – there are no options unless
Some believe Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad is just stalling. Over
the past year, more than 9,000 people have died. Tanks, helicopter
gunships and artillery fired on civilian neighbourhoods in Homs,
Hamas and half a dozen other Syrian cities. Tens of thousands have
fled to Turkey, far more have been displaced internally. While the al-
Assad regime regards the violence as justified to suppress what it
calls a terrorist effort to topple a legitimate government, much of
the rest of the world sees it as a brutal repression of a pro-
President al-Assad isn’t likely to approve any foreign force on
Syrian soil that can tip the military balance against him. China and
Russia seem implacably opposed to a Chapter Seven mandate that would
authorize Western, and perhaps Arab, nations to topple the al-Assad
regime. Humanitarian corridors and enclaves for the fleeing, while
viscerally attractive, are notoriously difficult to implement without
a believable threat of military enforcement. (© Copyright 2012
CTVglobemedia Publishing Inc. 04/28/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY