US house panel adds $680m. for Iron Dome (JERUSALEM POST) By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER, JPOST CORRESPONDENT 04/27/12)
Source: http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=267729
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
WASHINGTON – A US House subcommittee voted Thursday to dedicate an
additional $680 million in funding for Israel’s short-range missile
defense system.
The move by a House Armed Services subcommittee adds the funding for
the Iron Dome program on top of nearly $100m. in US assistance for
medium- and long-range missile defense and $3.1 billion in other
military assistance that comes from the State Department budget.
The money now slated for Iron Dome as part of the 2013 budget far
exceeds any past US expenditures for the program, with the previous
highest allocation of $205m. made in 2010.
The Obama administration’s original 2013 Pentagon budget proposal
contained no Iron Dome money, but a Pentagon spokesman said soon
after its unveiling that the administration wanted to include funding
for the project, though no amount was specified. The $205m.
allocation was also added later in the budgeting process.
“Iron Dome is a game changer, saving innocent lives and protecting
Israelis,” Rep. Howard Berman (D-California), the House Foreign
Affairs Committee ranking member, said in backing the new funding.
“Securing additional funding to deploy additional Iron Dome batteries
is an Israeli necessity, an American priority and a strategic
imperative.” The Pentagon budget also trims by some $6m. the funding
for Israel’s other missile defense programs, a reduction that was
seized on by Republicans earlier in the year.
Support for the $680m. Iron Dome boost is bipartisan, and comes at a
time when both parties have called for heavy budget cuts. In all, the
administration’s budget makes defense cuts that amount to nearly half
a trillion dollars across 10 years.
The Iron Dome money still needs to be approved by the full House
Armed Services Committee in May and then the full House and Senate
before being sent to the White House for the president’s signature, a
contentious process that faces additional obstacles in an election
year. (© 1995-2011, The Jerusalem Post 04/27/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY