Syria Plan Shows Allies´ Dwindling Options / U.N.´s Annan Say Monitors Could Force Cease-Fire; ´No Other Plan on the Table´ (WSJ) WALL STREET JOURNAL) By CHARLES LEVINSON and JOE LAURIA 04/25/12)
WALL STREET JOURNAL
WALL STREET JOURNAL Articles-Index-Top
After nearly a year of failed international bids to halt Syria´s
bloodshed, the U.N.´s top envoy to the country pushed to send
hundreds of unarmed monitors into a combat zone to police a cease-
fire that doesn´t exist.
Kofi Annan, the joint United Nations-Arab League envoy, told the U.N.
Security Council on Tuesday that the monitors can reduce violence on
"Observers not only see what is going on, but their presence has the
potential to change the political dynamics," Mr. Annan told the
Security Council, according to his prepared remarks.
The council agreed, in a Saturday resolution, to send 300 monitors to
Syria, responding to the failure of a cease-fire brokered by Mr.
Annan to take hold two weeks ago. The resolution appeared to call for
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to send the observers in once he
had determined the situation was safe enough.
But a Security Council diplomat said Tuesday the body doesn´t expect
an explicit safety briefing from Mr. Ban—but rather, that he could
instead report if Syria became too dangerous for deployment,
indicating the monitors are preparing to go in.
The proposition of sending in unarmed observers is unprecedented for
the U.N., which is balancing monitors´ safety against broad
international disbelief over reports that Syria´s government is
carrying out reprisal killings. The risky calculationunderscores how
few options are left to Washington and its European and Arab allies
in their bid to end Syria´s bloodshed.
"When is enough enough?" asked Ahmed Fawzi, Mr. Annan´s
spokesman. "That question is on everyone´s minds. This is not an open-
The U.N.´s Peacekeeping Department told the Security Council on
Tuesday it would take at least a month to deploy the first 100 of the
authorized 300 monitors, a Security Council diplomat said. It could
take even longer if their Syrian visas are delayed. There are signs
this is already happening, the diplomat said.
The U.N. observer mission was originally cast as a force deployed in
part to monitor a cessation of hostilities that was to have taken
effect on April 12. But the mission´s nature has quickly shifted.
U.N. officials now say the team, which is expected to swell from
about a dozen currently on the ground, will be deployed not to police
a cease-fire but to help bring one about.
The Security Council diplomat said Mr. Annan´s six-point plan calls
for monitors to deter violence, not just monitor a cease-fire, so the
current proposal doesn´t change the mission´s mandate.
Mr. Annan, in his statements, cited concern over reports that
government troops had been active in areas before and after
observers´ visits. "Government troops entered Hama yesterday after
observers departed, firing automatic weapons and killing a
significant number of people," he said, citing reports that, if
confirmed, would be "totally unacceptable and reprehensible."
Some Western officials and analysts said they fear the U.N.
initiative will spin out for months, allowing Mr. Assad to buy time
while continuing to crack down on opponents, a dynamic that Syrian
opposition members have complained has already been occurring for
months. During that time, the opposition has become both more
militarized and more fragmented.
"They are engaged in the most extraordinary U.N. mission I´ve known,
which is an unarmed observer mission to observe a peace that doesn´t
exist," said Salman Shaikh, director of think tank the Brookings Doha
Center, who has held posts at the U.N. "They are exposing themselves
to risks and dangers that the members of the council and the
secretary-general know, but nevertheless—in the absence of anything
If the Annan plan fails, Washington and its allies see few palatable
options left to get Mr. Assad out, as the U.S. and European and Arab
allies have sought, diplomats say.
"Nobody is really happy with the situation. No one really wants to
send them in. But what are the choices?" the Security Council
"What next: That´s the $60 million question," said another senior
U.N. official. "There is no other plan on the table. What´s next is a
protracted civil war."
Attacks by Syrian security forces on the city of Hama on Monday,
which appeared to target opposition areas and activists who met with
U.N. peace monitors a day earlier, have sharpened questions about the
Protesters and activists in Syria broadly compare the experience of
the U.N. observers to those from an Arab League mission that failed
earlier this year amid attacks that would set the stage for the
conflict´s worst violence yet.
"This time, again, people feel like the monitors have brought death
with them," said a resident of Arbaeen, the Hama neighborhood that
several people there say came under attack on Monday. "The solutions
they are presenting bring with them just more death."
On Tuesday, activists said the military continued to shell opposition
strongholds throughout the country. The Damascus suburb of Douma was
hit by artillery and machine-gun attacks, activists said, while
fighting between security forces and opposition fighters roiled
several other suburbs.
U.N. observers trying to visit the city of Homs on Tuesday were
unable to enter certain districts because of fighting between rebel
fighters and regime security forces, according to the opposition
Syria´s government and an opposition group both reported an explosion
in Damascus around midday Tuesday, which the government said was an
explosive device placed under a car by a terrorist group. In the
Damascus countryside, a retired lieutenant colonel and his brother
were assassinated when an armed terrorist group opened fire on them,
state agency Sana reported.
Mr. Annan´s spokesman, citing satellite imagery, said the Syrian
regime hasn´t withdrawn all of its heavy weapons from populated areas
as required by Mr. Annan´s cease-fire deal.
"They are claiming that this has happened. Satellite imagery,
however, and credible reports show that this has not fully happened,"
Mr. Fawzi said in separate comments in Geneva. "This is unacceptable."
Mr. Assad´s international opponents at the U.N. are expected to
continue to push for diplomatic pressure on Mr. Assad´s regime. But
the individual sanctions route appears to have been exhausted, as the
U.K. conceded on Monday.
Outside the U.N., the so-called Friends of the Syrian People
coalition could step up its direct material support for the
opposition, by establishing humanitarian corridors or providing
military support to the opposition. At the group´s meeting in
Istanbul earlier this month, the group took tentative steps in that
direction. The U.S. pledged funds for humanitarian aid and said for
the first time that it would send communications equipment to the
rebels. U.S. officials also acknowledging that other states could be
working to send lethal aid.
As recently as last month, it appeared Washington and its allies were
banging war drums for a more robust intervention in Syria. But since
then, the hawkish rhetoric has cooled some. Turkey, whose President
Abdullah Gul warned Mr. Assad earlier this month that the Annan plan
was his "last chance," after Syrian forces fired on a refugee camp
inside Turkish territory, seems less intent on stoking conflict now.
"The reason why Turkey has become more cautious is directly linked to
the cautiousness of the international community. Turkey was
previously much more aggressive and ambitious but it remains isolated
in the international community since major players chose to back the
Annan plan," said Sinan Ulgen, a former Turkish diplomat now at the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
"Turkey is now becoming more realistic about its policy towards
Syria; it´s becoming more conscious of the limitations of the tools
at its disposal," he said.
—Joe Parkinson and Nour Malas contributed to this article. (Copyright
© Dow Jones & Company, Inc.) 04/25/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY