Tunisia´s Religious Persecution (GateStone Institute) by Anna Mahjar-Barducci 04/20/12)
Source: http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3025/tunisia-religious-persecution
GateStone Institute
GateStone Institute Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
The new Ennahda Islamist rulers are keeping Ben Ali´s autocratic laws
to persecute not only political opponents, but also those who deviate
from the required path of religion.
After two Tunisian citizens were condemned to a seven-year prison
term for publishing writings perceived as offensive to Islam on March
28, Tunisian journalist Najoua Jo wrote, "In today´s Tunisia, has
anyone the right to be an atheist and to publicly avow it? The answer
is clear: it is no." It was published by the Tunisian media outlet,
Webdo.tn.
One of the two men, Ghazi Ben Mohamed Beji, was convicted for
publishing an essay in July 2011 entitled, "The Illusion of Islam,"
in which he depicted in a satiric way Prophet Mohammed´s life with
particular reference to his sexual habits. The other jailed man,
Jaber Ben Abdallah Majri, simply published photos on his Facebook
page containing cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed drawn from Beji´s
book.
As reported by Human Rights Watch, the two men, both 28, have been
tried and condemned by a Tunisian court for having published
documents "of such a nature as to be detrimental to public order and
morality." The two men were indicted on the basis of article 121 (3)
of the penal code. Beji managed to flee to Europe on March 9 and was
therefore tried in absentia. Mejri is deteriorating in prison.
This case is not the only one. A few days after that sentencing, the
official media reported that another Tunisian court sentenced a man,
Ramzi Absha, to four years in prison for desecrating the Koran. Absha
had allegedly thrown copies of the Koran into lavatories at several
mosques in the southern city of Ben Guerdane. According to his
lawyer, was suffering from mental illness -- a fact totally ignored
by the court.
According to the media outlet Tunisia Live, the Association for the
Memorization of the Holy Quran and Imams and Mosques of Ben Guerdane,
represented by a team of seven prosecutors, "demanded that the
Absha´s case be referred to the office of the public prosecutor
to ´carry on with the investigation and require that a maximum
sentence is inflicted on the accused.´
Mohamed Mars, the press officer representing the Association for the
Memorization of the Holy Quran and Imams and Mosques of Ben Guerdane,
stated to Tunisia Live that Absha´s crime is "quite significant in
principle." Mars added, however, that if Absha were to be diagnosed
with a mental illness, "he would no longer be responsible for his
act." He then hypocritically stated that he was not willing to
contradict the judge´s sentence on Absha, insisting that his
association and he do not want to add a political dimension to the
case.
The two cases, however, have already a political dimension: they both
contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which in its
article 18 reads: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his
religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with
others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief
in teaching, practice, worship and observance." Nobody, therefore,
has the right to be put in jail for his ideas and or profound
convictions. Despite international norms that are formally accepted
by all UN member states, Tunisia seems now attempting to dictate in
what one should believe.
The international media are still refer to ruling Ennahda party
as "moderate Islamist". Moderate probably means that it is not
affiliated to Al-Qaeda, but since the party -- which has strong ties
with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood – is ruling, Tunisia is
assisting in the repression, violence and jailing of people, whose
only crime was to express their opinions. The AFP reported that the
number of trials on charges of transgressing morality has surged
since the Islamist Ennahda party won Tunisia´s first post-revolution
elections in October.
Human Rights Watch commented that this episode is an example of the
need to repeal repressive laws dating to the Ben Ali era. This is
certainly true, but it should be added that the Ben Ali regime was
not particularly interested in going after miscreants, but used
illiberal laws to mainly persecute political opponents. The new
Ennahda Islamist rulers are instead keeping the Ben Ali´s autocratic
laws to persecute not only political opponents, but also those who
deviate from the required path of religion.
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY