The Devil We Don’t Know, Part II (FrontPageMagazine.com) Bestselling writer and speaker Nonie Darwish interview with Mark Tapson 04/16/12)
Source: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/16/the-devil-we-don%E2%80%99t-know-part-ii/
Front Page Magazine.com
Front Page Magazine.com Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Bestselling writer and speaker Nonie Darwish is the author of the
compelling autobiography Now They Call Me Infidel, about growing up
in Egypt and her break from Islam, and Cruel and Usual Punishment, an
exposé of the stark reality of sharia. Her new book, The Devil We
Don’t Know: The Dark Side of Revolutions in the Middle East, explains
what really lies behind the Arab Spring movement, and it exposes
Islam as the belief system that will inevitably doom those
revolutions.
For the first part of this interview, click here.
Mark Tapson: You write that “liberty and equality for women in the
Middle East are closely linked to defeating sharia.” But you note
that “Islamic feminism is a twisted kind of feminism that champions
pride in Islamic bondage.” Can you elaborate on that?
Nonie Darwish: It is a fact that there is hardly any Islamic feminist
movement. How could it be that female citizens of the most oppressive
anti-women system on Earth fail to take the opportunity of the Arab
Spring to change their destiny and the destiny of their daughters and
granddaughters? The answer to this question is very complex and part
of the larger problem of Islam itself. Muslim women are at a much
greater disadvantage if compared to Western feminists who did not
have to overcome death penalties, humiliation, flogging and societal
rejection and isolation if they violate religious laws.
There are some who believe that the defeat of Sharia and reformation
of Islam itself will come at the hands of its most oppressed group –
the women. That seems to be a logical conclusion, but I disagree that
Muslim women can do it alone. One cannot expect the prisoner to be in
charge of her own release when the guards of her prison are often
Muslim women themselves. For centuries Muslim women have molded their
lives to adapt to Sharia and its prison, which has resulted in many
having grown comfortable hiding behind their burqas. In many cases
they have created a warped mechanism of coping with a system that
treats them as a minor juvenile who needs the permission of male
family members to travel, to tell her who she can befriend and who
not, and even whom to marry.
When Muslim women open the Muslim scriptures they read descriptions
of women as being half the value of men, deficient in intelligence
and religion, not to be trusted or entrusted and that they are
slaves, possessions and toys to their husband, and even that they are
like dogs in distracting a man. For Muslim women to rise against what
Islamic holy books and laws condemned them to be, they must criticize
Sharia, which is an act of apostasy in itself. Expecting Muslim women
to be behind the reformation of Islam and Sharia is like asking
slaves to end their own slavery without the approval of their masters
or asking prisoners to get out of prison without the guards opening
the doors.
That does not mean that there are no brave and strong women in Muslim
society. To the contrary, the brutality of Islam has produced some of
the sharpest, most aggressive and persistent women in the world. But
Islamic feminism has incredible obstacles to overcome, the most
important of which is the accusation of apostasy if they criticize
Sharia. That is one reason they find it extremely hard to develop a
grassroots movement and bring onboard the majority of the population.
A Muslim woman’s inferior status in Muslim society has gone too deep
and is intertwined with all Islamic institutions. For Muslim women to
simply revolt against it would be regarded as an act of subversion
that is anti-man, anti-family, anti-religion, anti-government and,
worst of all, anti-Allah himself.
Women who defy Sharia or try to change it are harshly attacked and
silenced and they end up withdrawing from the scene altogether.
Islamists admit that the attacks against feminists are partially made
to make an example of them for any woman who would dare to follow in
their footsteps. Another major obstacle that Muslim feminists face is
the difficulty in connecting and reaching out to other women,
especially the poorer and less educated majority. Isolation in their
homes, distrust of strangers, and social taboos are major factors in
Islamic gender-segregated societies that restrain women’s
relationships, even with each other, and prevent them from
organizing, especially for feminist causes.
Because of blasphemy and apostasy laws forbidding anyone from
speaking or criticizing Islam and Sharia, feminists end up dancing
around the issues without hitting the bulls-eye or getting concrete
results. The only feminism allowed in this dynamic is the militant
Muslim woman wearing her Islamic garb with pride and promoting
Sharia, the very law that oppresses her. The only outlet for respect,
power and dignity to a Muslim women, is compliance and submission to
Islam. In other words, she can earn her dignity and pride only by
accepting her bondage.
That is why the few Islamic feminists seem to be running in circles
only to achieve minor cosmetic changes that scratch the surface, and
they have done so at a heavy price of earning disrespect and threats
without being taken seriously. And even more sadly, their example has
produced a group of Muslim women who embrace another solution: those
who believe if you can’t beat them, then join them. They have
discovered that the key to power and respect in Muslim society is to
become as radical, if not more radical, than men. We have all seen
Muslim women in black showing nothing but their eyes, demonstrating
in London carrying signs against British law and in support of Sharia
and warning Europe of another holocaust and another 9/11. Sharia
enforcers are pursuing a policy of generously rewarding women who
tell the world that women are happy under Sharia. And many embrace
jihad with open arms. We have all seen Arab mothers celebrate the
death of their jihadi sons and volunteering their other children for
jihad. I do not know what is in the hearts of these women, but
mothers who did so in Gaza were highly respected and rewarded
handsomely with life pensions; one mother was even elected to a
position in the Palestinian parliament.
An extreme and almost laughable case of pandering to Sharia occurred
in mid-2011 when a Kuwaiti woman, Salwa al-Mutairi, spoke to the
Kuwait Times demanding the re-establishment of sexual slavery for the
poor Muslim men. Seducing Muslim women to be on the side of Sharia
has reached even as far as U.S. academia. Islamic and Middle East
Studies departments in the U.S. have a good number of Muslim female
professors who defend the veil as “liberating.”
Dalia Mogahed, the head-covered Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer and
Sharia defender who became President Obama’s Islamic advisor, has
been recently voted the most powerful woman in the Arab world. Only
defenders of Sharia and Islamism get such honor.
To sum up, the dilemma of Islamic feminism is to see it as a twisted
kind of feminism that champions pride in Islamic bondage. This is
what all Muslim women can or are allowed to do. It allows a unique
kind of feminist aggressive submission to the abusive laws of Islam –
a kind of mass Stockholm syndrome where the victim, the Muslim woman,
identifies with and defends the very laws that oppress her. As a
result, there are many assertive militant Muslim women who act like
the “virtue police” against other women. Muslim countries have
succeeded in developing a self-destructive kind of feminism that pits
one woman against another in competition to defend the religion that
taught her to loathe herself and makes her loathe other women as well.
MT: You conclude the book by writing that Islam has sown the seeds of
its own collapse and cannot survive a confrontation with the truth.
But it seems these days that the West too has sown the seeds of its
own collapse, and that the truth is in retreat and the lie of Islam
is on the march. Are you optimistic that the West can survive that
confrontation?
ND: The West is certainly capable of surviving the confrontation with
Islam, but so far it has been unwilling to use its power to stop the
Islamic avalanche. The West is immersed in self-blame and
multiculturalism, whereas the Muslim world is obsessed with blaming
and conquering the outside world. This is a marriage made in hell and
if this continues, Western civilization will not survive the Islamic
tsunami and meltdown coming to our shores.
In my last chapter, “House of Cards: The Downfall of Islam as We Know
It,” I said that within the DNA of Islam is a self-destructive
element. It is fear of the truth and a constant urge to fight those
who value truth. Islam planted its own seed of destruction the day it
relied on lies, violence, robbery, slavery and rape for its
expansion. For 1400 years, Muslims have managed to suppress the truth
about their religion and condoned acts of unspeakable injustice,
violence, torture as justifiable acts by their Prophet that must
never be criticized under penalty of death. In the process they have
produced a morally confused and self-destructive culture that is
incapable of withstanding the challenges of honest debate or
criticism. Islam and its institutions are under huge pressure to be
truthful and I do not believe that holding on to the lies, threats
and terror in this day and age can last forever.
Incredibly, Mohammed himself was not at peace with his own message.
He was not optimistic about the future of Islam and Muslims when he
said more than one time that “Islam started as something strange and
it would again revert (to its old position) of being strange just as
it started, and it would recede between the two mosques just as the
serpent crawls back into its hole.” [Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Number
0270] He also said, “Muslims will be the scum and the rubbish even
though their numbers may increase; the enemy will not fear Muslims
anymore. This will be because the Muslims will love the world and
dislike death.” [Sunaan Abu Dawud, 37.4284]
Like a Ponzi scheme, Islam must expand to survive. The Ponzi scheme
works as long as it can bring in new members and expand. In that
sense, Islam works only when more and more people at the periphery of
the Islamic state join the bottom of the pyramid of Islam and empower
it to last longer. The key to its survival is to continue convincing
new believers and keep lying to the naïve Muslim followers. Muslims
are constantly counting and reporting the good news to the Muslim
world on how many new Western converts are coming to Islam. But when
the light of truth reaches the pyramid, especially the majority on
the bottom who are not benefiting from the system, being sacrificed
for the purpose of preserving and perpetuating the fraud, then the
whole system will collapse and the colossal fraud will be exposed.
Remember no one can succeed to lie to all people all the time.
Islam’s pyramid scheme that was about to collapse in the 19th and
early 20th centuries was revived by the discovery of oil, Western
dollars, and the welcoming of huge Muslim populations to the West
which enabled the pyramid of lies to continue expanding and receiving
a new bloodline. It is up to the West to develop the courage to cut
off the bloodline or go down in history as yet another casualty of
great civilizations destroyed by Islamic imperialism. (Copyright ©
2012 FrontPageMagazine.com 04/16/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY