Analysis: Non-constructive ambiguity on Iran (JERUSALEM POST) By YAAKOV KATZ 04/15/12)
Source: http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=266033
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
As expected, the talks between the world powers and Iran ended on
Saturday with a decision – not one that would suspend the enrichment
of uranium or escalate economic sanctions – but one to hold another
round of talks in about five weeks.
Israel is likely to remain quiet until then and allow the West to try
and get the job done. But if that doesn’t happen, the military option
will move back to the front of the line right when the summer begins,
a time some might call the perfect season – due to clear skies – for
a military strike.
But what happens if the talks conclude with a resolution that is
neither a clear victory for Israel nor a clear failure? What if the
Iranians agree to suspend uranium enrichment to a level of 20 percent
but refuse to stop enrichment to a level of 3.5%? What if Iran agrees
to surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium but refuses to open
its facilities to international inspections? Such outcomes would
place Israel in a difficult position.
On the one hand, it would not be satisfied. But on the other, it
would not want to do anything that might be seen as undermining an
outcome likely to be hailed by US President Barack Obama – who is
looking to be reelected – as a diplomatic victory.
Attacking in such a situation would go against everything Israel so
far has tried to do, which is to show the world that it is not an
obstacle to diplomacy and negotiations so that when the day comes and
it can no longer wait it will be able to say, “We gave you a chance
but we no longer have a choice.”
Jerusalem made its conditions for the talks known ahead of time. The
strategy was to ensure that the West would go into the talks knowing
it would take a lot to satisfy Israel. On the other hand, Jerusalem
purposely set the bar higher than that of Washington so that if
something less were achieved it might still be enough.
Ultimately though, Israeli defense officials are skeptical that the
talks will bear fruit.
Iran is simply perceived to be close to the bomb and is not yet
hurting enough, despite the unprecedented sanctions.
With already five tons of low enriched uranium and over 100 kilograms
of uranium that has been enriched to 20 percent, Iran already has
enough fissionable material to make four nuclear weapons if it
decides to.
Tehran has overcome every obstacle placed in its way for the last
decade, including sabotage and assassinations, and today is on the
threshold.
Getting it to stop is not going to be easy. (© 1995-2011, The
Jerusalem Post 04/15/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY