Baird lobbied hard against Palestinian bid for statehood (THE GLOBE AND MAIL) CAMPBELL CLARK AND JUSTIN LING OTTAWA AND MONTREAL 04/11/12)
GLOBE AND MAIL
GLOBE AND MAIL Articles-Index-Top
Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird personally took to the phones
last year to try to swing countries to oppose Palestinian efforts to
be recognized as a state by the United Nations, according to newly
released documents that for the first time reveal in detail how
intensely Canada worked behind the scenes to block the statehood
Though it was clear that Canada opposed the resolution – and Mr.
Baird met with foreign counterparts when the issue came to a head at
UN headquarters in New York last September – the documents contain
details of a high-level lobbying campaign in the preceding months.
It was a controversial issue that his counterparts in some other
countries worked to dodge. But with Israel and the United States
working feverishly to prevent recognition of a Palestinian state,
Canada’s Foreign Minister personally intervened to support that
Mr. Baird called at least eight fellow foreign ministers from
countries including Chile, South Korea and Australia, taking on an
issue that threatened to spark a confrontation at the UN.
And although the Palestinian resolution was eventually put on hold
last year – it’s still on the backburner at the UN Security Council –
it could be revived within months. Palestinian Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas told an Israeli delegation this past weekend that he
will renew the bid within months if Israel does not embrace new peace
talks, according to reports.
Canadian diplomats have lobbied other countries on other UN votes,
but when the Foreign Minister personally does the calling, it’s a
signal that Ottawa considers the issue a priority.
Briefing notes obtained under the Access to Information law –
partially blacked out – show Mr. Baird was briefed for calls last
August to the foreign ministers of Australia, New Zealand, Singapore,
South Korea, Thailand, Chile, Panama and El Salvador.
According to a government source, that list of target nations was the
result of consultation with “like-minded” countries on the same side
of the issue – which in this case most notably included the United
States and Israel. The countries Mr. Baird was to call were
considered to have some connection to Canada that might make them
It is the first time details have emerged about the countries Canada
targeted in the run-up to the opening of last fall’s UN session.
Australia and New Zealand, both part of a bloc with Canada at the UN,
were uncertain. While Australia is traditionally pro-Israel, the
country’s Foreign Minister, Kevin Rudd, had proposed abstaining. Some
in Australia interpreted that as a desire to avoid flack as the
country campaigns for a seat on the Security Council.
“The parties should be building trust. Pushing the UN path is counter-
productive to achieving this trust. We should encourage the
Palestinians to return to peace talks instead,” Mr. Baird was to tell
acting Australian foreign minister Craig Emerson, who was the trade
minister filling in while Mr. Rudd was recovering from heart surgery,
according to a briefing note.
If Mr. Emerson or ministers from other countries raised concerns that
Israel was undermining Middle East trust by allowing settlements to
be built on occupied land, Mr. Baird intended to agree that that,
too, was unhelpful. “Settlements are counter-productive to efforts to
reach a negotiated agreement,” his briefing notes for the calls
A spokesman for Mr. Baird, Joseph Lavoie, said the calls were made to
press Ottawa’s argument that the Palestinian-statehood resolution
would be an obstacle to Mideast peace.
“Minister Baird called the countries in question to express Canada’s
position that this resolution would make a resumption of peace talks
more difficult and raise expectations without changing the facts on
the ground to improve lives,” he said.
Mr. Baird’s role, clearly, was not to prevent the Security Council
from recognizing a Palestinian state – none of the countries on the
calls list were Security Council members.
But with the United States vowing to veto such recognition in the
Security Council, the Palestinian Authority had threatened a Plan B –
to ask the wider General Assembly, made up of all UN members, to
upgrade its status from “entity” to “non-member observer state.” It
would almost certainly win that vote, but Israel, the United States
and Canada lobbied to try to keep the vote from being lopsided and to
ensure that many of the world’s democracies sided with Israel.
“There is this notion that if an anti-Israel resolution is denied a
majority of those countries, like the Europeans, or the ones that
have some kind of track record of adherence to democratic principles,
it mitigates the impact of the anti-Israel resolution,” said Shimon
Fogel, the chief executive officer of the Centre for Israel and
The briefing notes sometimes attempted to provide a little background
on which way the country tends to lean on Mideast issues. Chile, for
example, had already recognized Palestinian statehood, but refused to
take a position on its borders. Biographies of the foreign ministers
were attached, explaining, for example, that Panamanian Foreign
Minister Juan Carlos Varela not only has been supportive of Canadian
participation in the country’s mining industry; he’s also a member of
the strict Catholic group Opus Dei.
Before the eight calls in August, Mr. Baird met in July with Hanan
Ashrawi, the veteran PLO figure dispatched by Mr. Abbas as his envoy
on the statehood campaign. A briefing note for that meeting indicated
that Ms. Ashrawi would not be expecting the Harper government to
change its mind on the resolution, but would probably instead ask the
Harper government not to lobby others. In fact, Ms. Ashrawi publicly
asked Ottawa not to lobby – to no avail.
Justin Ling is Special to The Globe and Mail (© Copyright 2012
CTVglobemedia Publishing Inc. 04/11/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY