Iran nuclear talks set for this week (WASHINGTON POST) By Thomas Erdbrink TEHRAN, IRAN 04/08/12)
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/iran-nuclear-talks-set-for-this-week/2012/04/08/gIQALaSI4S_story.html
WASHINGTON POST
WASHINGTON POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
TEHRAN — Nuclear talks between Iran and six world powers, including
the United States, are slated to begin Friday in Istanbul, Iranian
state media said Sunday.
Iran’s official English-language Press TV quoted an unnamed official
at the Supreme National Security Council, which handles the country’s
nuclear program, as setting the date and place of the talks. Reuters
quoted a spokeswoman for the European Union foreign policy chief
confirming that the talks would take place this week in Istanbul.
The site had been in question after Iranian politicians declared that
Turkey, a key negotiator in the talks, was no longer neutral ground
because it actively opposes Syria, an Iranian ally. The uncertainty
about the location had prompted Western worries that Iran was not
planning to seriously engage the world powers — the United States,
Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — in the first talks since
January 2011.
The six nations are expected to press Iran to accept curbs on its
nuclear program that would make it far more difficult for Tehran to
build a nuclear weapon. A key demand, Western diplomats say, is that
Iran halt production at its uranium-enrichment plant near Qom, a
Shiite holy city about 90 miles south of Tehran, which was built in
mountain tunnels beyond the reach of all but the most advanced bombs
and missiles. The United States also expects Iran to fully suspend
production of 20 percent enriched uranium, which Iran says it needs
to power a 43-year-old U.S.-built nuclear test reactor that produces
radio isotopes.
In a signal that Iran is willing to negotiate over its stockpile of
20 percent enriched uranium, the head of the Atomic Energy
Organization of Iran, Fereydoon Abbasi, said Sunday that his country
was considering a stop to the activity and lowing the enrichment
levels.
“We do not produce more 20 percent fuel than we need,” Abbasi told
the Iranian Students’ News Agency. He said it was easy to change the
centrifuges now enriching uranium up to 20 percent and use them for
making nuclear fuel up to 3.5 percent enriched. “Our systems are
capable of making this change,” Abbasi said.
The Western request to close the facility near Qom, called Fordow,
is “not logical,” Abbasi said, stressing that the mountain bunker was
no different from Iran’s main nuclear facility at Natanz. He also
said that Iran’s only semi-operating nuclear reactor, in the town of
Bushehr, was running on fuel provided by Russia.
Last month, some prominent Iranian elected officials and analysts —
many of them close to the country’s hard-line leadership — said it
was highly unlikely that Iran would accept even a temporary halt in
its production of enriched uranium. They said recent economic
sanctions and military threats against the country have made Iranian
leaders even more determined to continue enriching uranium, despite
the worsening toll on Iran’s currency and oil industry.
“Please do not make the general public expect any freeze on the
enrichment of uranium,” said Hossein Sheikholeslami, a former Iranian
ambassador to Syria who was once a leader of the student movement
that took 52 U.S. Embassy workers hostage in 1979. “We regard this as
our inalienable right.”
The enrichment facility near Qom houses Iran’s fallback nuclear
energy program: a series of centrifuges hidden deep inside a mountain
bunker. Iran has said that it built the facility to protect its
nuclear technology from attack by Israel or the United States.
“Closing down that site is out of the question,” said Sheikholeslami,
who is a key adviser to Iran’s former top nuclear negotiator, Ali
Larijani.
But Iran might be willing to talk about its stockpile of the higher-
grade uranium, he said. Iranian officials say they were forced to
enrich the uranium to a higher level in order to keep their U.S.-
built reactor running after Western powers refused to deliver new
batches of fuel in 2009.
“I don’t think we can trust the West for now giving us that fuel, but
Iran’s negotiating team might be willing to debate this option,”
Sheikholeslami said. (© 2010 The Washington Post Company 04/08/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY