´Loud rhetoric on Iran is counter-productive´ (JERUSALEM POST) By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER, JPOST CORRESPONDENT 03/27/12)
Source: http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=263551
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
WASHINGTON – The White House upped the stakes Monday in the battle
over the rhetoric surrounding a possible military strike on Iran’s
nuclear program.
Tony Blinken, Vice President Joe Biden’s national security adviser,
declared that the “loud talk about Iran” was “incredibly counter-
productive,” echoing comments made by US President Barack Obama on
the same issue.
But he continued by saying that this talk not only drives up the
price of oil, conferring more profits to Iran – a point Obama has
made – but it also hurts the sanctions efforts and the view of the US-
Israel relationship.
“It dilutes the impact of sanctions,” he charged, appearing at the J
Street annual conference. “And it feeds false hope that it’s possible
to drive a wedge between the United States and Israel.”
In regard to dangers facing the US-Israel relationship, he
warned, “Here’s what could actually harm US-Israeli relations and the
security of the Jewish state: To subject either to the vagaries of
partisan politics or turning them into election- year talking points.”
His words elicited loud applause, with some giving him a standing
ovation. The same point made by others in the administration,
however, has been less well-received among Republicans, who see
themselves as the butt of that argument, and have pushed back that
such a perspective limits open debate.
“This is not about stifling discussion or disagreement or dissent,”
Blinken countered Monday. “It’s about a very simple proposition: When
it comes to discussing US policy toward Israel... by all means, let’s
question each other’s judgments. But let’s not question each other’s
motives.”
Blinken said that he welcomed a debate on the topic, and that there
would occasionally be differences between how Israel and America view
issues.
“It does’t mean we’re always going to see eye to eye with Israel.
Even the closest of allies disagree – and I know this will come as a
surprise to you – just as Israelis disagree amongst themselves,”
Blinken told J Street. “When we disagree, we make our views clear.
It’s a sign of mutual respect. It’s a sign of a relationship robust
enough and mature enough to overcome whatever tactical differences we
may have.”
He also said that he welcomed a debate with the progressive lobby
itself on how to resolve the impasse between Israelis and
Palestinians.
“It is a daunting challenge,” he said. “There is no shortcut to
peace. These issues can only be resolved through negotiations.”
A few members of the audience booed at that comment, to which Blinken
remarked to laughter, “Some of you may disagree, but that’s our
position.”
He described the current point as a “period of assessment,” but
stressed that, “Just because we don’t say something or you don’t see
something doesn’t mean we’re not doing anything.”
He said the US remained “deeply engaged” on the issue and works “day
in and day out” toward achieving peace.
Blinken praised J Street as an important organization reinforcing
that effort.
“J Street has emerged as an influential and constructive voice not
just here in Washington but far beyond,” he said. “That voice, your
voice, strengthens American foreign policy.”
Blinken spoke following White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett,
the other representative of the Obama administration to address the J
Street annual convention.
She acknowledged that there can often be “fierce disagreements over
what path to take,” but that remaining committed to progress was key.
“We know that many of you are sometimes frustrated with the state of
the peace process. We have a lot of work ahead,” she acknowledged.
But Jarrett reaffirmed the American commitment to the peace process,
an issue also raised by President Shimon Peres, who delivered a video
message before she and Blinken spoke.
“Peace is in the long term interest of Israel. It is in the long term
interest of the Palestinian people. And it is in the interest of the
region. And it is in the interest of the United States and it’s in
the interest of the world,” Jarrett said to enthusiastic applause. (©
1995-2011, The Jerusalem Post 03/27/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY