Economic distress, not ideological fervor, is behind Sinai´s terror boom (HA´ARETZ NEWS) By Zvi Bar´el 03/25/12)
Source: http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/economic-distress-not-ideological-fervor-is-behind-sinai-s-terror-boom-1.420483
HA'ARETZ} NEWS SERVICE
HA'ARETZ} NEWS SERVICE Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Egyptian security forces breathed a sigh of relief twice this week.
Once after Bedouin from the Rafah region agreed to lift the siege of
the military base used by international peacekeepers in Sinai, and
another time after Bedouin from Nuweiba "agreed" to release a Czech
woman who was taken hostage while acting as a tour guide to a group
of 15 Czech tourists who were on their way to Sharm el-Sheikh.
The three previous abductions, of U.S., Korean, and Brazilian
tourists, also ended peacefully. The security forces, accompanied by
the Bedouin tribe leaders, negotiated successfully with the
abductors, who demanded the release of several Bedouin from their
tribe, and so the affair ended.
Sinai, inhabited by some 400,000 Egyptian citizens, 60% of which are
Bedouin, has developed since the revolution into a "free" territory
where every weapon-owner, and there are many in Sinai, can
essentially do as he wishes. Blow up the gas pipeline, block roads,
attack Egyptian forces, or abduct tourists, as is common in Yemen.
Terror cells were present in Sinai before the revolution. Weapons
entered freely from Sudan and Cairo, and al-Qaida cells were grouped
in central Sinai. The core support for these organizations came from
the Bedouin tribes, who suffered for dozens of years from economic
discrimination – they received fewer funds from the government, did
not see the development of workplaces and establishment of production
plants in their area, and suffered under the strictness of the
Mubarak regime.
Following the revolution, and especially after the establishment of
the current government headed by Kamal al-Ganzuri, the Bedouin tribes
began hearing bombastic declarations, promising that from now on, a
dramatic change would take place in Sinai: a new authority would be
formed to take care of investments in the peninsula; significant
funds will be allocated toward factories generating jobs in areas
stricken by high unemployment rates; new roads will be paved and new
schools will be built; and, mainly, al-Ganzuri promised Sinai would
be treated as "a bone in the nation´s body," even visiting the Sinai
town of el-Arish himself, a rare feat for an Egyptian prime minister.
None of those promises has yet been fulfilled. In late February, al-
Ganzuri said that "next week the Sinai development authority will be
formed." That "next week" has come and gone followed by another two
weeks, with no result in sight. The Bedouin, for their part, require
neither an authority nor a committee. Their request was much more
modest: installing water lines to connect the Sinai´s Bedouin towns,
which currently rely on water tanks, the delivery of which costs 200
Egyptian Pounds (EGP); setting up power lines; and reimbursing
Bedouin tribes for land taken by Egyptian Natural Gas Company
(GASCO), which supplies Israel and Jordan with natural gas. According
to Bedouin in the el-Arish area, GASCO gave district authorities EGP
7 million to settle the land dispute, of which only 3 million were
passed on to surrounding Bedouin. Landowners then split that sum,
resulting in every family member receiving only a meager amount.
It´s too easy to blame al-Qaida and other radical groups when looking
for the motivation behind the 13 explosions that hit the gas line
connecting Egypt and Israel, as well as Jordan. When one sees the
Bedouin pay inordinate sums for whatever gas supply they receive, and
as they see how GASCO, operating from land taken from them, generates
huge profit from pumping gas to Israel and Jordan, one cannot help
but ponder the frustration that may drive them to act, or aid those
who wish to injure Egypt´s economy.
This month, GASCO estimated losses directly related to the attacks at
about $170 million, not including losses resulting from the inability
to transport the gas, as well as Egypt´s transformation into an
unreliable supplier. But this is not an inevitable reality, seeing
that Egypt could have invested some of the funds necessary to secure
the gas installations in the Bedouin communities.
One example of the Bedouin´s complaints is el-Arish´s industrial
zone, which the government decided to construct back in 2004. In an
interview with the Egyptian newspaper Al-Youm Al-Sabe´a, one workshop
owner said that the government forced factory owners to purchase land
in the industrial zone at a price of 12 EGP per-square meter. As it
later turned out, the land was taken from Bedouin, who were supposed
to be reimbursed for their property. However, the money never
arrived, resulting in the Bedouin preventing factory and workshop
owners from building the structures the land was intended for, until
they receive the compensation they were due. Until that happens,
there are neither reparations nor jobs.
When there is no work, new sources of income are developed: smuggling
and trade using Gaza´s underground tunnels; smuggling refugees and
migrant workers into Israel; and selling arms and explosives to
radical groups with a variety of goals – from damaging Egypt´s
economy, to sabotaging Israel-Egypt ties by targeting the gas line.
Research conducted by the Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper discovered that
Bedouin are selling TNT explosives culled from armament found
throughout the Sinai for anywhere between 10,000 and 45,000 EGP per
ton. They also provide terror squads with hideouts, as well as, for a
hefty sum, indicating potential hidden mountainous stashes for those
same groups. After the Libyan revolution, they have also begun
trading arms smuggled from Libya into Egypt.
Egyptian security forces have no real way of tracking the radical
groups´ activities without cooperation from the Bedouin. In the
absence of significant economic action that would offer the Bedouin a
fair alternative to their illegal sources of income, the military
reinforcements Egypt wants to introduce into the Sinai will be
meaningless. "A Sinai empty [of government presence] is a state
threat," Isam Sharaf, who served as premier before al-Ganzuri, said
this week. That threat is far from being resolved. (© Copyright 2012
Ha´aretz 03/25/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY