Iran: achievements and challenges (ISRAEL HAYOM OP-ED) Dr. Ephraim Kam 03/22/12)
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=1609
Israel Hayom
Israel Hayom Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Over the years, Israel has achieved an important accomplishment on
the Iranian nuclear issue. It introduced the issue into global
consciousness and succeeded in persuading numerous governments about
the severity of the threat. In other words: Iran is on its way to
developing nuclear weapons, and such weapons in the hands of Tehran’s
extremist regime creates a real threat to the stability of the Middle
East, to the security of many countries and to Israel’s security as
well. Therefore, everything must be done to stop Iran from developing
nuclear weapons.
This achievement was not obvious. Israel succeeded by making a years-
long effort that included disseminating intelligence information
about the progress of Iran’s nuclear program, maintaining contact
with a number of foreign governments and international bodies and by
Israeli leaders repeatedly asserting that the country would not
accept a nuclear Iran.
In this respect, Israel’s achievement is impressive. Until a few
years ago, there was a debate among governments, intelligence
communities and experts about the significance of Iran’s nuclear
program – and mainly over whether Iran intends to, and is capable of,
developing nuclear weapons. The debate is over. Today, no serious
figure accepts Iran’s claim that its nuclear program is intended for
peaceful purposes. Israel had important partners in bringing about
this awareness: The U.S. government and others in the West, the
International Atomic Energy Agency and its inspectors who exposed the
suspicious elements of Iran’s nuclear program and the Iranians
themselves. Their suspicious behavior in this affair has indicated
that they have something to hide.
However, in recent months Israel’s declarations have led it to a
disconcerting and harmful position. Israel is currently perceived as
the one trying to push the American government to act against its own
interests and against its will. Israel has emphasized that it is
responsible for its own security if it comes to the conclusion there
is no way to stop Iran other than by use of force. Yet there are
those in the U.S. who suspect that behind declarations about the
necessity of a military option lies the intention of spurring the
U.S. into attacking Iran. It has superior tools for carrying out such
an operation. The U.S. administration is concerned that even if
Israel attacks, it would be dragged into the conflict if Iran
responds by striking U.S. or its allies’ targets in the Gulf.
According to this view, if the U.S. attacks Iran or becomes entangled
in a violent conflict following an Israeli strike, Israel will be
blamed. Moreover, even now, before a single bullet has been fired at
Iran, the U.S. administration, namely U.S. President Barack Obama,
has almost explicitly said that Israel’s remarks about a potential
military strike have led to higher oil prices.
It goes without saying that the price of oil is a central concern for
most governments in the world, and is certainly extremely important
to Obama. The price of oil could negatively affect his election to a
second term in office. The more the claim takes root that a bond
exists between Israel’s position on Iran and higher oil prices,
Israel will likely face a wave of comments and accusations from
Western countries.
For that reason, Israeli leaders must lower their profiles – at least
publicly – when it comes to launching an attack on Iran, but not give
up on the principle of the matter. The accomplishment has already
been achieved. The severity of the Iranian nuclear threat is clear to
almost all governments, and they are taking into account that Israel
could strike if diplomacy and sanctions fail. That is the main reason
they are now willing to impose unprecedented sanctions on Iran’s
financial and oil sectors. It is also safe to assume that Iran has
gotten the message and believes that Israel is likely to attack. At
this point, there is no use in adding fuel to the fire and repeating
again and again the necessity for military action if left with no
other choice. It’s best to leave that for discussions behind closed
doors. Perhaps silence on Israel’s part will persuade the Iranians
that it is conducting a covert operation meant to catch them off
guard and surprise them. It’s not for nothing that they say silence
is golden.
The writer is deputy head of the Institute for National Security
Studies.
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY