No Holds Barred: Karzai calls American troops ‘demons’ (JERUSALEM POST OP-ED) By SHMULEY BOTEACH 03/20/12)
Source: http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=262528
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM POST Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
Hamid Karzai recently called the brave and selfless members of the
United States military “demons” who were guilty of perhaps “500”
atrocities against the people of the Afghanistan. One would have
thought that the American commander-in-chief would swiftly denounce
this stunning act of ingratitude by reminding him that nearly 2,000
American troops have given their lives for the freedom of the Afghani
people. They are angels of mercy, not demons.
But in remaining silent President Barack Obama not only missed an
opportunity to defend the honor of our brave men and women in
uniform, but also missed an opportunity to remind Muslims the world
over of the beautiful tenets of their faith, that would never brook
such shameful ingratitude. The Koran, Sura 14, says that those who
are grateful will be given more by God.
And the prophet Mohammad also said, “Gratitude for the abundance you
have received is the best insurance that the abundance will
continue.” The point is this: capitulation by Western leaders in the
face of pressure or bullying from Islamic leaders who, with their
misguided actions, betray a great world religion is bad for the West
and bad for Islam.
For the past three years I banged my head against a wall called the
City of Englewood – its mayor and council – cajoling, pushing and
nearly begging that they do something about the Libyan Embassy that
is my immediate next-door neighbor. Tax it, fine it, do something to
make life uncomfortable for the Gaddafi government that owned it so
that the murderous regime would choose to sell it and return the
millions of dollars invested in it – all in an attempt to make it
comfortable for Gaddafi to stay for a short while – and return the
money to the Libyan people to whom it belonged.
Now comes the unbelievable news that the city’s inaction potentially
endangered its inhabitants greatly, and not just me, its neighbor. We
now know that the Gaddafi regime, under the concealment of diplomatic
immunity, was using its embassies throughout the world to stockpile
handguns, sub-machine guns, plastic explosives, hand grenades and
wiretapping equipment.
In some embassies the equipment even included booby-trapped vehicles
and rocket-propelled grenades.
All this was revealed when the weapons were discovered by
representatives of Libya’s interim government, the National
Transitional Council, who started taking over the embassies abroad.
When NTC Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammed Abdul Aziz was asked
whether he thought that the weapons, which were shipped in diplomatic
bags, were intended for covert operations by Gaddafi and his regime,
he answered “I have no single doubt in my mind.” Aziz revealed that
the weapons discovered thus far are just the tip of the iceberg and
even included “chemical stuff.” I still have no idea if the Embassy
next door to me has been searched after this information was
revealed. Pretty scary for a small Jersey town or for the rabbi who
lives next door with nine kids and a synagogue on his property, or
the Moriah Jewish Day School with a thousand Jewish kids that is also
a next-door neighbor.
I had actually told city officials how worried I was that there might
be arms in the embassy. But like everything else it was just shrugged
off. This led to a clash between me and Congressman Steve Rothman,
who publicly gave me and other Englewood residents advice to
be “appropriately good neighbors” to the Libyans and followed up
later, after I had publicly rejected his advice, with publishing a
three-page press release attacking me and defending the status quo of
the Libyans living tax-free in Englewood, since the city had lost an
earlier challenge nearly 30 years earlier.
But what we have learned from the brave Arab peoples of Libya, Egypt
and Syria in the courageous Arab Spring is that there can be no
capitulation in the face of oppression and terrorism.
BBC head Mark Thomson recently confessed – to the Oxford University
research project known as The Free Speech Debate – to giving Islam a
better media portrayal than Christianity out of fear, arguing that
the media had to consider the difference between “violent threats” in
place of polite complaints if they pushed ahead with certain types of
satire. Thompson said: “Without question, ‘I complain in the
strongest possible terms,’ is different from, ‘I complain in the
strongest possible terms and I am loading my AK-47 as I write.’ This
definitely raises the stakes.”
Thomson was commenting on a 2005 BBC portrayal of Jesus wearing a
diaper, something they pushed ahead with even as 45,000 people
complained to the broadcaster about its irreverent treatment of
Christian themes. Thompson belatedly accepted their argument that the
BBC would not have ridiculed Islam in a similar fashion.
The idea that one of the world’s foremost news organizations would
capitulate to fear and intimidation is deeply disturbing, and not
principally for Westerners but for Muslims. The more the West shows
an unwillingness to bow in the face of fright and panic, the more our
oppressed Muslim brothers and sisters who live in various
totalitarian regimes will feel they have committed partners in
confronting tyrants like Bashar Assad of Syria, and the more Islam
will be purged of a militaristic strain that is a betrayal of its
core values.
Those who argue that Islam is an inherently violent faith, or anti-
Jewish, deliberately deny history, as when Sultan Saladin took back
Jerusalem in 1187 and allowed all Christians to ransom their lives
and the penniless to go free. The Christians had expected the same
harsh treatment they had meted out in conquering Jerusalem in 1099,
when all Muslims and Jews were massacred.
Saladin was also generous in his treatment of the Jewish community in
his realm. In 1190, he called on Jews to settle once again within the
walls of Jerusalem, since they had been banned from the city during
the Crusader occupation. Maimonides, one of Judaism’s greatest
thinkers, was court physician to Saladin.
To assail Islam as inherently anti-modern is likewise to ignore how
already in the ninth century Muslim rulers were prioritizing general
education when few others were. Al-Mamun, caliph of the Abbasid
dynasty, established state-funded academies that translated Greek and
other works of antiquity, thereby predating European universities by
some three centuries. The Abbasid Muslim Empire brought about
agricultural innovations in the 8th century that would not be seen in
the West until late in the 12th century. Al-Razi of Baghdad wrote
numerous medical books in the 10th century which included
groundbreaking health treatments which the West would not match for
another 600 years.
In the 16th century Muslim Sultan Akbar of India was renowned for
cross-cultural political appointments and enacting laws that embraced
religious tolerance and protection of women and children. He was also
one of the first commanders to insist on humane treatment of captured
enemy troops.
Islam today can experience the same kind of enlightened golden age it
has in the past if it, along with the West, stands up to the
murderers and bullies who betray a great world religion by daring to
speak wickedly in its name. (© 1995-2011, The Jerusalem Post 03/20/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY