U.S. Considers New Message on Iran (WSJ) WALL STREET JOURNAL) By CAROL E. LEE and JAY SOLOMON Washington 02/28/12)
WALL STREET JOURNAL
WALL STREET JOURNAL Articles-Index-Top
WASHINGTON—Complaints from Israel about the U.S.´s public engagement
with Iran have pushed the White House to consider more forcefully
outlining potential military actions, and the "red lines" Iran must
not cross, as soon as this weekend, according to people familiar with
President Barack Obama could use a speech on Sunday before a powerful
pro-Israel lobby to more clearly define U.S. policy on military
action against Iran in advance of his meeting on Monday with Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, these people said.
Israeli officials have been fuming over what they perceive as
deliberate attempts by the Obama administration to undermine the
deterrent effect of the Jewish state´s threat to use force against
Tehran by publicly questioning the utility and timing of such strikes.
The Israeli leader has told U.S. officials that he wants Mr. Obama to
outline specifically what Washington views as the "red lines" that
Iran cannot cross, something the administration is considering as it
drafts the president´s speech at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee and sets the agenda for his meeting with Mr. Netanyahu.
Some administration officials said that if Mr. Obama decides to more
clearly define his red lines, he is likely to do it in private with
Mr. Netanyahu, rather than state it in his AIPAC speech.
Mr. Netanyahu and other top Israeli officials also are pressing for
Mr. Obama to publicly clarify his insistence that "all options are on
the table" in addressing the Iranian nuclear threat.
Mr. Netanyahu recently conveyed his displeasure with the
administration in separate meetings in Jerusalem with National
Security Adviser Tom Donilon and a group of U.S. senators, said
people involved in the meetings.
He complained that comments by senior U.S. officials have cast Israel
as the problem, not Iran, and only encouraged Tehran to press ahead
with its nuclear program by casting doubt over the West´s willingness
to use force.
Israeli officials were particularly alarmed when Gen. Martin Dempsey,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described Iran as a "rational
actor" in a CNN interview after a recent visit to Israel.
The Israelis made clear in these meetings that Mr. Netanyahu intends
to press Mr. Obama on the two points as the two allies more closely
try to align their strategies to contain Tehran´s nuclear threat.
"The Israelis are unnerved," said Sen. Lindsay Graham (R., S.C.), who
was one of five U.S. senators who had lunch with Mr. Netanyahu last
Tuesday in Jerusalem. "They think the administration is sending the
wrong signal, and I do too."
Mr. Graham, a staunch Israel supporter, added: "The president needs
to be reassuring to the Israelis that the policy of the United States
is etched in stone: we will do everything, including military action,
to stop a nuclear-armed Iran. I hope the administration when they
talk about ´all options´ will better define what those options are.
We´re getting too far into the game to be overly nuanced now."
Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.), who also was in the meeting with Mr.
Netanyahu last week, said he had never seen an Israeli leader "that
"He was angry," Sen. McCain said. "And, frankly, I´ve never seen U.S.-
Israel relations at this point."
The March 5 meeting between Messrs. Netanyahu and Obama is part of a
critical week of diplomacy and politicking in Washington that could
affect not only the standoff with Iran, but also Mr. Obama´s re-
election campaign. U.S-Israel relations have been rocky since both
leaders took office in 2009. Mr. Obama´s often frosty relationship
with Mr. Netanyahu has degenerated at times into public spats between
the two sides, raising concerns among the president´s Jewish
The annual AIPAC conference, which comes just days before a series of
state votes on Tuesday in Republican primaries, is seen as a crucial
venue through which to win Jewish support. Republican presidential
candidates Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich have all been
invited to address the group, and Mr. Netanyahu will speak the day
after his meeting with Mr. Obama.
Mr. Obama will use his AIPAC speech to stress that his administration
has developed deeper defense and intelligence-sharing ties with
Israel than any other U.S. president, administration officials said.
Seeking to build on his speech at the United Nations General Assembly
last September, as one senior administration official put it, Mr.
Obama will also remind Jewish voters at AIPAC that the U.S. stood up
for Israel when the Palestinians sought to unilaterally claim
statehood through a vote at the U.N. Security Council last fall.
The president also will outline the significant steps Washington has
taken in recent months to increase Iran´s economic and diplomatic
isolation through sanctions, officials said, and stress both the need
to give those efforts time to work and the administration´s belief
that there still is room for diplomacy.
Mr. Obama will repeat that his policy of also leaving all options on
the table, including military force, remains, officials said. Aides
are discussing what it would mean to go into greater detail. They are
expected to make a decision later this week.
Administration officials acknowledge that Republican candidates
believe they have an opening to attack Mr. Obama as weak in support
of Israel as well as soft on confronting Iran. And because of the
recent tensions in U.S.-Israel relations, the president´s aides are
approaching this moment carefully.
"We have more to prove," said one senior administration official.
Iran has proven to be a divisive issue for the two allies for months.
Mr. Netanyahu was skeptical about Mr. Obama´s initial efforts to
engage Iran´s theocratic government diplomatically in a bid to
contain its nuclear program. And the U.S. and Israel have developed
differing red lines to gauge the nuclear threat.
Israel has defined its red line as Iran´s development of a nuclear
weapons "capability," rather than the actual assembly of an atomic
weapon. The U.S. has cited the latter and American officials continue
to argue that the West still has a few years to dissuade Tehran from
developing a bomb.
Last week, the United Nation´s nuclear watchdog announced that Tehran
had more than tripled its monthly production of the purer form of
enriched uranium that is closer to weapons grade. (Copyright © Dow
Jones & Company, Inc.) 02/28/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY