Atomic Agency Says Iran Is Making Fuel at Protected Site (NY) TIMES) By DAVID E. SANGER and WILLIAM J. BROAD WASHINGTON 02/25/12)
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/world/middleeast/atomic-agency-says-iran-is-making-fuel-at-protected-site.html
NEW YORK TIMES
NEW YORK TIMES Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
WASHINGTON — International nuclear inspectors reported on Friday that
Iran was moving more rapidly to produce nuclear fuel than many
outsiders expected, at a deep underground site that Israel and the
United States have said is better protected from attack than Iran’s
older facilities.
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency indicated that
for the first time, Iran had begun producing fuel inside the new
facility, in a mountain near the holy city of Qum. The agency’s
inspectors found in their most recent visits that over the past three
months, Iran had tripled its production capacity for a more purified
type of fuel that is far closer to what is needed to make the core of
a nuclear weapon.
The report is likely to inflame the debate over whether Iran is
nearing what Israel’s defense minister, Ehud Barak, calls entering
a “zone of immunity.” The phrase refers to a vaguely defined point
beyond which Iran could potentially produce weapon fuel without fear
of an air attack that could wipe out its facilities.
The Iranians showed the inspectors the progress they had made at the
underground facility, also known as Fordo, as part of the regular
inspection of declared nuclear sites. They seemed eager to
demonstrate that despite sanctions, sabotage and several United
Nations Security Council resolutions, they were forging ahead in
building a facility with a capability they insist is purely for
energy production and medical research. But the Iranians know that
this facility, under 250 feet of granite, is the one that worries
Israel and the West the most, and the resources that Iran is putting
into equipping it leaves considerable ambiguity about their intent.
For years, the Iranians have refused to answer questions raised by
the inspectors about what the I.A.E.A. delicately calls “possible
military dimensions” of the Iranian program — evidence that some work
has been conducted on warhead designs, trigger devices and similar
technologies that strongly suggest that the country is contemplating
using its fuel for weapons.
The White House, which has been trying to increase the economic
pressure on Iran while trying to dissuade Israel from attacking
Iran’s nuclear facilities, characterized the newest report as more
evidence of Iranian defiance. “Iran has continued to pursue its
uranium enrichment program in violation of multiple United Nations
Security Council resolutions without demonstrating any credible or
legitimate purpose for doing so,” the National Security Council
spokesman, Tommy Vietor, said on Friday. “When combined with its
continued stonewalling of international inspectors, Iran’s actions
demonstrate why Iran has failed to convince the international
community that is nuclear program is peaceful.”
Despite the I.A.E.A.’s findings at Fordo, American officials insist
that Iran’s overall progress has been halting at best. The report
also shows that despite Iran’s repeated boasts, it is still having
trouble using a significant amount of next-generation equipment to
make fuel. The United States also argues, in anonymous interviews and
in conversations with Israeli officials, that Iran’s program has a
number of vulnerabilities that could be exploited should it decide to
try to develop a bomb. American intelligence officials say they do
not believe that Iranian leaders have made that decision, though
Israeli and British intelligence disagree.
When President Obama and other Western leaders first made public the
discovery of the new facility in 2009, American officials said they
believed that its exposure meant it would never be used. However, the
report on Friday indicated that 696 centrifuges — the tall, silvery
machines that enrich uranium by spinning it at supersonic speeds —
have been installed. An additional 2,088 have been partially
installed, meaning the facility is approaching its design capacity.
The 11-page report also described how Iran has refused, in two
separate meetings with inspectors, to answer questions raised in the
I.A.E.A.’s last report, issued in November, about experiments that
could be linked to work on nuclear weapons. Inspectors were told they
could not visit a military site called Parchin, where the inspectors
suspect that work was done on conventional explosives that can be
used to trigger a warhead. “Iran stated that it was still not able to
grant access to that site,” the report said.
Iran has said that it produces fuel enriched to 20 percent purity,
the highest level the I.A.E.A. reported being produced at Fordo, to
replenish a small nuclear reactor in Tehran that is used to make
medical isotopes. That claim appears to be true, at least in part:
the inspectors say a fraction of the fuel was used to manufacture a
single fuel assembly that was inserted in that reactor in recent days
as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad watched. The event was televised in
Iran, underscoring the country’s intent to continue its nuclear
program despite international sanctions and sabotage.
Iranian officials have said in recent months, however, that they plan
to produce more of the fuel enriched to 20 percent purity than is
needed for the reactor. “They have now produced nearly enough 20
percent to fuel the Tehran Research Reactor for the next 20 years,”
one diplomat in Europe who closely follows the agency’s work in Iran
said on Friday. The fact that Iran is increasing production further
has heighted suspicions in the West that it wants to stockpile the
fuel in case it decides, in the future, to produce bomb-grade
material. It would take relatively little additional work to get that
fuel to the 90 percent purity needed for weapon fuel.
Iranian officials deny that this is their intent, and Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, explicitly ruled out
producing a weapon in a recent speech.
David E. Sanger reported from Washington, and William J. Broad from
New York. (Copyright 2012 The New York Times Company 02/25/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY