Thanks to the U.S. elections - and Iran (HAŽARETZ NEWS) By Natasha Mozgovaya 02/23/12)
HA'ARETZ} NEWS SERVICE
HA'ARETZ} NEWS SERVICE Articles-Index-Top
On March 5, U.S. President Barack Obama will receive Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House. The meeting probably won´t be
as awkward as the one in May 2011, which also coincided with the
annual AIPAC conference. Two days before Obama´s speech to AIPAC, he
spoke at the State Department and outlined the parameters of a future
Israeli-Palestinian agreement, which he defined as the 1967 borders
with mutually agreed swaps. The swaps were totally ignored, and
Netanyahu lectured his host on the threats facing the Jewish state
and "indefensible" borders. As a result, at the AIPAC conference,
Obama had to explain what he actually meant in his previous speech.
This time, the meeting falls in the middle of a presidential
elections year, and the two leaders have a much weightier question to
ponder, courtesy of the Iranian government: to attack or not to
attack. Hence the most toxic bilateral issue, settlement expansion,
will likely be off the table this time.
But it´s not that it doesn´t exist. This month, The Jerusalem Fund, a
Washington-based pro-Palestinian think tank, gave the State
Department a report on settler violence. It says that from September
2004 through December 2011, there were over 3,700 incidents of
settler violence against Palestinians. To those who follow the news,
the statistics won´t come as a big surprise: stone throwing, 32
percent; arson, 11 percent; destruction of property, 11 percent;
shootings, 5 percent; vehicular attack (which could be anything,
including running over Palestinians´ sheep ), 4 percent; physical
attacks, 1 percent.
"With the exception of 2005, which saw a flurry of violent settler
activity, settler violence has steadily increased year after year,"
the report said, adding that there is no particular correlation
between house demolitions in the settlements and attacks on
Palestinians. "2011 was by far the most violent year, seeing a 39
percent increase over the previous year and a 315 percent increase
over a mere five years ago ... During this same period, Palestinian
violence in the West Bank dropped dramatically (95% )."
The report says the Israeli government should step up law
enforcement, including by arresting settler leaders and rabbis who
advocate violence, while Washington "should press the government of
Israel in both private and public forums to immediately enact
policies to curb Israeli settler violence."
´Immoral and idiotic´
The State Department´s reaction to such reports is that the
administration´s position on the settlements has not changed: It does
not see their expansion as helpful to the peace process. But Danny
Dayan, chairman of the Yesha Council of settlements, thinks the U.S.
position has changed.
"Look, I think these violent incidents and vandalism are the second
biggest strategic threat to the settlers after Barack Obama," he
said. "Although I do tend to believe that the recent change with
Obama´s position is genuine, and not only political. I think
President Obama is an intelligent man, and he understood that
pressing on this topic ... will only lead him to further
humiliations. Any American president that puts all his chips on this
solution will be humiliated, because the two-state solution is an
"Why should Netanyahu and Obama waste time on this during their
meeting? If [former Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert, with all he offered,
didn´t succeed, who will? What strategy could they possibly have to
prevent Hamas from taking over the Palestinian state the day after it
Dayan said he hasn´t seen this particular report, but he knows
settler violence exists and treats it "with utmost severity."
"It´s immoral and it´s idiotic," he said. "And I agree with the
report´s claim that there is not necessarily a correlation between
Israeli government actions or Palestinian actions and these
incidents. It´s simply one of the rotten fruits of the 
disengagement from Gaza."
There are dozens, maybe several hundred, settlers engaged in
violence, out of over 350,000 settlers in the West Bank, not
including East Jerusalem, he stressed. A tiny percentage.
"You don´t need many people to put a mosque on fire," he said. "But
while two years ago, when I condemned it, I might have been a
minority, now I believe my views are well into consensus among the
settlers. These are mostly young people who think, following the
disengagement, that the game of democracy is not worth playing ...
And yes, I personally would turn over those who are doing this."
Nevertheless, Dayan said, settler violence is "not comparable to the
Palestinian terror" that was the "real cause of deteriorating
relations between the Palestinians and the settlers."
He also scoffed at Israel Apartheid Week. "It´s pure demonization",
he said. "When there was an initiative to boycott the cultural center
in [the settlement of] Ariel, I contacted the organizer at the Cameri
Theater and told her that the real apartheid road is the one that
leads to her theater, because a Palestinian would be stopped trying
to get there, not on the road to Ariel. These ´separate roads´ are a
"Besides," he added, "the worst damage to Israel´s image is caused by
Gaza, which we left, not the West Bank. The Goldstone [inquiry
commission] went to Gaza, the flotilla went to Gaza. In the West
Bank, the army can do surgical operations. In Gaza, they have to
A beacon of civil rights
We recently attended two Israeli friends´ wedding in Washington, DC.
After 17 years together and two adorable kids, they finally decided
to tie the knot. Not that, being gay, they were able to do it much
As the ceremony unfolded, they couldn´t hide their excitement. The
guests were as moved as the two women, and their kids were running
around with flowers, giggling. It was a perfectly happy day, because
for a loving couple that had gotten used to the thought that they
wouldn´t be able to enjoy the same rights as other couples, it was
suddenly possible. When you see others´ happiness so close, you can´t
stop asking yourself: Who would be cruel enough to deny them this
right? Who could stand there and tell them to their face, no, you
don´t deserve it? Yet in the United States, this is still far from
Earlier this month, a federal appeals court in California overturned
that state´s gay marriage ban as unconstitutional. But the marriages
are still barred, since the matter is expected to reach the Supreme
Court. Last Friday, Republican Governor Chris Christie vetoed a bill
to legalize gay marriage in his state, New Jersey.
Still, gay marriage has been legalized in seven U.S. states plus
Washington, DC, and Maryland is soon expected to become the eighth.
In Israel, for all the praise of Tel Aviv as the best gay travel
destination, the issue is also far from being solved. But thank you,
America, for being a beacon of civil rights on this topic - albeit a
flickering one. (© Copyright 2012 Ha´aretz 02/23/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY