Last Friday, yet another devout Muslim, Amine El Khalifi, was arrested wearing a vest full of explosives before he could blow up the U.S. Capitol building. The thwarted homicide bombing marked at least the 45th publicly known attempted Islamic terrorist attack against the United States since 9/11, and it is the sixth such attack targeting Washington, D.C.

That is news. But was that the focus of news coverage in the following days? No, it was barely even mentioned by an enemedia that increasingly shows itself to be aligned with the jihad force. Instead of stories about this attempted jihad terror attack, the mainstream media were full of reports about how the New York Police Department had been monitoring members of the Muslim Students Association, a Muslim Brotherhood group.

The vicious media swarm about the monitoring of the MSA was another attack upon the very counterterrorism tools that are keeping us safe.

The real story here is, who is leaking this stuff? Who is the mole? There have been over 18,000 Islamic attacks across the world since 9/11, and a story about the NYPD trying to prevent the next one is news? This is war. These spies leaking this intel should be charged with sedition.

The Muslim Brotherhood groups MSA and Muslim Student Union (MSU) were both named unindicted conspirators in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history. They are the Muslim Brotherhood in America. They should be monitored.

Why wouldn’t law enforcement be on the job? Robert Spencer restates the obvious: that the purpose of this kind of coverage is to stop law enforcement from doing its job, “which will have the effect, intended or not, of allowing the jihadist and Islamic supremacist activities of the MSAs to advance unimpeded.”

I, for one, am glad that the NYPD is on the job. Ayn Rand said, “Honest people are never touchy about the matter of being trusted.” Indeed.

The media coverage on this is madness. More sabotage from the war within. The enemedia has declared war on America.

Meanwhile, the latest attempted jihad attack at the Capitol serves as yet another reminder of the importance of maintaining strong counterterrorism tools. Terrorists continue to seek to harm the U.S. The nation must not become complacent.

Yet the media are at war with the American people. This jihadist, Amine El Khalifi, has been living in the U.S. for 12 years, but Fox News and the rest of the U.S. media refer to this devout Muslim solely as a “Moroccan,” as if Morocco had anything to do with this act of war. The press does not dare say “Muslim,” even though these Muslim soldiers scream “Allahu akbar” and go jihad in the cause of Islam. They don’t mention that El Khalifi is a Muslim and barely take notice of the fact that just before he went out on his jihad suicide mission to the Capitol, he prayed at the notorious Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Northern Virginia.

He was apprehended with his suicide vest shortly after leaving his mosque of succor and strength. Is it any wonder jihadist groups like Hamas-tied CAIR are demanding that all mosque surveillance stop? Dar al-Hijrah, meanwhile, was Anwar Awlaki’s mosque, as well as that of a couple of the 9/11 Muslim terrorists.

But instead of running investigative stories about what goes on in mosques like that to lead Muslims to want to go jihad, in this story, as in every other story about a jihad plot, the media employ code words to avoid saying “Muslim.” Employ your decoder ring to read between the lines. In the U.K., the enemedia and political quislings use the word “Asian” for Muslim. In France, they use “youth.” In Denmark, Sweden and Germany, they use “immigrant” for Muslim (even if the jihadists are second or third generation). In many European countries, “immigrant youth.” In the U.S., the media refer to the attacker’s country of origin or nationality in place of Muslim. In Israel, they use “Arab.”

Lipstick on a savage. It is jihad in the cause of Islam. Period.

We have had more cases like this in the past two years than we had in all the years prior to 9/11. In the past year alone, at least 20 people have been arrested in the United States on terrorism-related charges, according to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. But the New York Times recently reported that there was no significant jihad threat in the U.S.

And what has been Barack Obama’s response? Disarm the FBI, disarm the military, ban “jihad” from the lexicon. Obama invites the universal caliphate organization, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, to Washington, D.C., behind closed doors to talk about imposing bans on free speech in submission to the blasphemy laws under the Shariah. And the FBI has now announced that it is open to U.S. Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups “establishing a committee to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training.”

Another major Islamic act of war on America has been thwarted, despite the embedded enemies within. And who are the bad guys? Well, we are, of course, for reporting it and calling it what it is: jihad. (© 2012 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc. 02/22/12)