Dossier Details Egypt’s Case Against Democracy Groups (NY) TIMES) By ROD NORDLAND and DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK CAIRO, EGYPT 02/21/12)
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/world/middleeast/egypt-relying-on-accusatory-testimony-against-foreign-groups.html
NEW YORK TIMES
NEW YORK TIMES Articles-Index-Top
Publishers-Index-Top
CAIRO — The Egyptian prosecution’s summary of the case against at
least 16 Americans and others from five democracy and human rights
groups focuses largely on the testimony of their accusers, with
evidence primarily limited to proof that their organizations used
American and other foreign funds for payrolls and rent.
The prosecution’s dossier also shows leaps of logic in a case that
has imperiled a decades-old alliance with Washington and threatened
Egypt with the loss of $1.5 billion in aid. The case, for example,
cites documents seized in December from one group, the International
Republican Institute, that included Wikipedia maps of Egypt showing
the country divided into four parts. While Egypt is typically
described as comprising four regions — upper and lower Egypt, greater
Cairo and the Suez Canal and Sinai region — the prosecution suggested
that the maps showed a plan to dismember the country.
The summary, compiled by the Office of the Investigating Judge of
Egypt’s Ministry of Justice, sets the stage for the group trial,
scheduled to begin on Sunday. A copy was given to The New York Times
by a person close to the investigation on the condition of anonymity
because of legal restrictions.
The primary force behind the prosecution is a holdover from the
Mubarak era, Fayza Abul Naga, who has continued to press the case
against the democracy groups, despite opposition from military rulers
worried about losing American aid, most of which goes to the armed
forces. She is foremost among the 13 accusing witnesses, most of them
also formerly officials under President Hosni Mubarak, who was
toppled a year ago. Some are underlings of Ms. Abul Naga, who as
minister of planning and international cooperation is in charge of
dealing with foreign aid.
Ms. Abul Naga’s central accusation is that the groups were
unregistered under Egyptian law, and that the American groups were
receiving about $150 million in aid diverted from the larger American
aid package to Egypt. They are the International Republican
Institute, the National Democratic Institute — which have ties to
Congressional party leaders — Freedom House and the International
Center for Journalists. The fifth group, the Konrad Adenauer
Foundation, is German, and receives money from that government.
More than 40 defendants have been indicted on charges of illegal
activity by foreign agents, and face penalties of up to five years in
jail. Three of the six accused Americans who are still in Egypt have
taken refuge in the American Embassy, including Sam LaHood of the
Republican Institute. He is the son of Transportation Secretary Ray
LaHood.
Democratization has been a goal of the Obama administration in Egypt,
and the case against the Americans has infuriated many in Congress
and the administration.
Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, the chairman of the board
of the International Republican Institute, arrived Monday in Cairo,
where he met with the military leader Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein
Tantawi and other officials and came away with assurances of a speedy
resolution to the case. “We’re not making threats,” Mr. McCain
said. “There’s plenty of time to make threats.”
Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who was part of
the McCain delegation, was sharply critical of the case. “As an
American, I’m offended that people would say things about these
organizations,” Mr. Graham said, calling the charges “ridiculous.”
“The person who brought this forward I think has an agenda that’s not
helpful,” he said.
Senator Graham also praised the moderation of the Muslim Brotherhood
officials the delegation had met and said they were sympathetic to
the plight of those facing prosecution under laws enacted under the
Mubarak government.
But a spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, whose party dominates
Parliament after recent elections, warned the United States against
trying to interfere in Egypt’s judicial process. “Would America allow
any foreign agenda or country to interfere in its affairs like this?”
asked the spokesman, Mahmoud Ghuzlan. “Then why should America expect
Egypt to accept this kind of interference without an investigation or
a trial?”
Ms. Abul Naga’s testimony, bolstered by the other witnesses, details
the activities of the groups, mostly training political parties in
how to organize, raise money, deal with the news media and the like,
but it also ranges into far broader accusations of illicit activity.
The prosecution’s dossier reiterated accusations that the
groups “worked in coordination with the C.I.A.,” served “U.S. and
Israeli interests,” and incited “religious tensions between Muslims
and Copts.” Their goal, according to the testimony in the dossier,
is “bringing down the ruling regime in Egypt, no matter what it is,”
while “pandering to the U.S. Congress, Jewish lobbyists and American
public opinion.”
Ms. Abul Naga is quoted as saying, “Conducting such activities is a
blatant challenge to Egyptian sovereignty and serves ulterior motives
that gravely harm Egypt and its national security.” She described the
Republican Institute as “far-right leaning” and Freedom House
as “founded by the Jewish lobbyists.” She portrayed the groups as
having fomented insurgencies elsewhere, saying at one point that
their activities “cannot be viewed in isolation from the secession of
Christian South Sudan from the predominantly Muslim north.”
Despite Ms. Abul Naga’s association with the ousted government, her
charges and the legal case have generally struck a responsive chord
among many elements of the new Egyptian political scene. Al Azhar,
the leading Sunni Islamic institute in Egypt, and a fundamentalist
Salafist sheik, Mohammad Hassan, formed a group with the goal of
raising up to $2 billion to replace any lost American aid. Three days
ago, the military-appointed Egyptian cabinet voted to support the
effort, the Fund for Dignity and Pride, and many prominent Egyptians
have pledged support. The fund has so far raised $10 million.
In addition to the Americans who are charged, the defendants include
14 Egyptians, 3 Serbs, 2 Lebanese, 2 Germans, a Palestinian, a
Jordanian and a Norwegian, according to the state-owned newspaper Al
Ahram. Varying semiofficial accounts have put the number of Americans
charged from 16 to 20.
Some of the accused have remained in Egypt voluntarily. Nancy Okail,
an Egyptian citizen with British residency who is the head of Freedom
House here, was abroad when she learned of the charges against her
(via Twitter, she said), but she chose to return with her 3-year-old
twin daughters.
“We know that legally they don’t have anything against us, but this
is about the xenophobia that they have been instigating for months
and months now to show there is a foreign plot to ruin the country,”
Ms. Okail said. “I don’t know who’s instigating it, if it’s Fayza
Abul Naga or she’s just a front for someone else.”
Ms. Abul Naga was not immediately available for comment, according to
her media coordinator, an Egyptian Army general, Bahgat el-Shirbini.
Rod Nordland reported from Cairo, and David. D. Kirkpatrick from
Beirut, Lebanon. Mayy El Sheikh and Liam Stack contributed reporting
from Cairo. (Copyright 2012 The New York Times Company 02/21/12)
Return to Top
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY